Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 DECEMBER 2021

Cartel Conduct: Courts Reject Conspiracy Claims In Proposed Class Actions

Recent decisions from the British Columbia Supreme Court in Latifi v. The TDL Group Corp., 2021 BCSC 2183 and the Federal Court of Canada in Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.

CanadaAntitrust/Competition Law

Recent decisions from the British Columbia Supreme Court in Latifi v. The TDL Group Corp., 2021 BCSC 2183 and the Federal Court of Canada in Jensen v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 2021 FC 1185 involved proposed class action suits alleging breaches of the criminal conspiracy provisions in section 45 of the Competition Act. These decisions exemplify an increased willingness by the courts to scrutinize the proposed causes of action and pleadings in determining whether proposed class actions should move forward.

Background

Latifi and Jensen were proposed class action suits. Each alleged breaches of the criminal conspiracy provisions in section 45 of the Act. Private parties can sue for damages suffered as a result of such breaches. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from