Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 SEPTEMBER 2008

A "Monster Of Complexity" — Certification Denied In DRAM Price-Fixing Cases

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

The B.C. Supreme Court recently refused to make what would have been the first-ever contested certification order in a class action brought on behalf of indirect and direct purchasers in a Canadian price-fixing case.

CanadaAntitrust/Competition Law

The B.C. Supreme Court recently refused to make what would have been the first-ever contested certification order in a class action brought on behalf of indirect and direct purchasers in a Canadian price-fixing case. The plaintiff sought to certify a class action on behalf of B.C. residents who had purchased dynamic random access memory (DRAM) or products containing DRAM, alleging that the defendants had engaged in an international conspiracy to fix prices of these computer memory chips. The court refused certification, finding that the plaintiff had failed to propose a viable class-wide method of establishing harm and liability. A related class action was similarly denied by the Québec Superior Court, albeit on different grounds.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from