Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 OCTOBER 2021

Victorian Supreme Court Denies First Ever Contingency Fee Applications In Class Actions

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

The plaintiffs in two separate class actions (Fox v Westpac Banking Corporation & Anor (Fox) and Crawford v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd & Ors (Crawford))...

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Short

The Situation: In July 2020, Victoria introduced landmark legislation to allow, for the first time in any Australian jurisdiction, the charging of contingency fees by law firms acting for plaintiffs in class actions. The charging of contingency fees is only permitted under the legislation if the court makes a "Group Cost Order"("GCO"), which will only be made where the order is "appropriate or necessary to ensure that justice is done in the proceeding".

The Decision: In the first decision of the Victorian Supreme Court in respect of a GCO —Fox v Westpac; Crawford v ANZ [2021] VSC 573—Justice Nichols rejected applications by two plaintiffs in consumer class actions seeking to set the legal fees of all class members at 25% of any future recovery.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from