Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 JULY 2009

The Obligation Of A Review Panel To Give Reasons

The quality and clarity of reasons given by an administrative law maker continue to be informed by the High Court's decision in Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] 185 CLR 259 ("MIA v Liang") where a Court should not be concerned with the "looseness in the language" invoked by an administrative decision maker.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Cherilyn Ribbons
Cherilyn Ribbons

Bojko v ICM Property Service Pty Limited & Ors [2009] NSWCA 175 (2 July 2009)

Allsop P, Giles JA, Handley AJA

In Brief

  • The quality and clarity of reasons given by an administrative law maker continue to be informed by the High Court's decision in Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang [1996] 185 CLR 259 ("MIA v Liang") where a Court should not be concerned with the "looseness in the language" invoked by an administrative decision maker.
  • A statutorily constituted Authority has no duty to provide cogent reasons as to its decisions unless such a requirement is contained within the constituting legislation and supporting regulations.

Background

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from