Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JULY 2014

Supermarket not liable for slip in shopping centre common area

The court found that Woolworths did not owe a duty of care to users of the common area adjacent to their premises.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In this Alert, Senior Associate Brooke Jacobs and Solicitor Elizabeth Harvey examine the recent decision of Woolworths Ltd v Ryder [2014] NSWCA 223, in which the New South Wales Court of Appeal found that a supermarket in a shopping centre did not owe a duty of care to users of the common area adjacent to their premises, in circumstances where the relevant hazard had been created by a product purchased from and opened in the supermarket.

Facts

The plaintiff sustained injury when she slipped on a patch of soapy liquid and fell while in the common area of a shopping centre, just outside a Woolworths supermarket.

The soapy liquid had been spilt by a little girl blowing bubbles with a wand. Her parents had only moments before purchased the bottle of bubbles. It was alleged that a Woolworths cash register operator had opened the bottle of bubble mixture for the little girl.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from