Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 AUGUST 2013

Settlement Of Australian Class Actions When Not All Group Members Are Equal

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

In a recent case, approval of a class action settlement was sought in the context of the representative party's claim, and a number of common questions, having been determined at trial and after an appeal.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Peterson v Merck Sharp and Dohme (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 6) [2013] FCA 447, approval of a class action settlement was sought in the context of the representative party's claim, and a number of common questions, having been determined at trial and after an appeal. The representative party had been unsuccessful due to risk factors specific to the representative party, but other group members without those risk factors may be successful. The proposed settlement was designed to make payments to group members regardless of whether they were subject to the risk factors and treated all group members alike. Jessup J refused approval on the basis that the settlement was unfair and unreasonable.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from