Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 MAY 2012

Offers of compromise should not refer to costs "as agreed or assessed"

If made correctly, an offer of compromise gives an award of indemnity costs from the day following the date of service.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In brief - Correctly phrased offers of compromise provide almost certain award of indemnity costs

Offers of compromise, pursuant to rule 20.26 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) (UCPR), are often used as a tool by both plaintiffs and defendants in encouraging early settlement negotiations, given the potentially adverse costs implications if the matter is run to a hearing and a better outcome is not achieved.

Offers of compromise also serve as an effective mechanism for costs protection when dealing with an "unreasonable" opponent. If made correctly, an offer of compromise provides an almost certain award of indemnity costs from the day following the date of service.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from