Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 APRIL 2009

Novus Actus Interveniens

Criminal conduct of a third party constitutes a “novus actus interveniens”.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

State Rail Authority (NSW) v Chu [2008] NSWCA 14

  • Criminal conduct of a third party constitutes a "novus actus interveniens".
  • Sexual assault breaks the causal link from slip and fall at train station.

This is another slip and fall case, this time involving stairs which we will again choose to categorise as a defective product. The real reason, however, why we are including it is because of the criminal content that is not usually evident in a product liability case.

A person cannot be liable for damages for failure to take care to prevent personal injury unless negligence on its part caused the harm. The current law in Australia (as laid down by the High Court) as to whether negligence caused an injury is to be answered by the application of 'commonsense'.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from