Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 AUGUST 2016

Not out of proportion: ANZ late payment fees not penalties

This ANZ decision affects banking contracts as well as other contracts, including construction and consumer contracts.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Handing down its decision in Paciocco v ANZ [2016] HCA 28 (Paciocco v ANZ), the High Court of Australia has determined late payment fees charged by banks on consumer credit card accounts are not penalties.

The decision not only affects banking contracts, but all contracts, including construction and other forms of consumer contracts, such as those with utilities and telecommunications providers.

Key points

The High Court has re-affirmed the "out of all proportion" test as the overriding test to determine whether a stipulation requiring the payment of money to secure a party's performance of a contractual obligation is unenforceable as a penalty. Where the monetary amount is out of all proportion, it will be deemed a penalty and the claimant will be left to rely on damages at law.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from