Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 OCTOBER 2017

Non-assistance clauses in settlement agreements in light of Commonweath v Sanofi

The decision highlights the care and consideration necessary if drafting settlement agreements for multi-party disputes.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

IN BRIEF - TAKE CARE WHEN DRAFTING NON-ASSISTANCE CLAUSES

Can a non-assistance clause in a settlement agreement prohibit witnesses from voluntarily assisting other litigants to a proceeding? The recent decision in Commonwealth of Australia v Sanofi (formerly Sanofi-Aventis) [2017] FCA 382 has thrown doubt on to the enforceability of such clauses, particularly in circumstances where the effect of the clause would restrict witnesses from discussing evidentiary matters with the remaining parties to the proceeding.

In multi-party disputes, it is common for a number of parties to settle their dispute prior to trial. Clauses restricting the settling party from assisting other parties to the proceeding are often included in settlement deeds. However, in Commonwealth v Sanofi, the Federal Court of Australia held that a clause contained in a settlement agreement, which prohibited witnesses from assisting another litigant to the proceedings, was unenforceable on the basis

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from