Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 NOVEMBER 2018

Montreal Convention time bar proves fatal to airline passengers claim

Be conscious of the time limitation period and take appropriate steps to ensure that the correct defendant is sued in time.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In brief - Plaintiff fails in application to correct identity of respondent outside of time limitation period

The two year time bar under the Montreal Convention 1999 has brought a potential claimant unstuck when legal action was commenced against the wrong legal entity as carrier in Bhatia v Malaysian Airline System Berhad [2018] FCA 1471.

Dr Bhatia commenced legal action in the Federal Court of Australia against Malaysian Airline System Berhad (MAS) on 4 June 2018, claiming damages for personal injuries he alleges he sustained on a Malaysian Airlines flight between London and Kuala Lumpur on 5 June 2016.

Plaintiff's right to damages and Articles 33 and 35 of the Montreal Convention

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from