Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 APRIL 2013

Inactive but not Dead: A Plaintiff’s Entitlement to enter a Case for Trial after it is placed on the Inactive List

A WA court has held that a plaintiff may file an entry for trial even when the case is on the court's inactive list.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Andrew Corke (Formerly With Kott Gunning)
Andrew Corke (Formerly With Kott Gunning)
Author LinkedIn connections

The District Court of Western Australia recently held in Strzelecki Holdings Pty Ltd v Wiebel [2013] WADC 27 (Strzelecki) that the plaintiff may file an entry for trial even when the case is on the court's inactive list. The court also held that once an entry for trial is filed, the matter is deemed to be taken off the inactive case list, even if the entry is later countermanded (revoked).

In Strzelecki, the plaintiff submitted an entry for trial on the last permissible day, failing which the matter would have been dismissed for want of prosecution. The defendant argued that doing so was not permissible as the District Court Rules, namely rule 38, do not allow a plaintiff to enter a matter for trial once the case is on the inactive list.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from