Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 DECEMBER 2017

Impending insurance indemnity ruled not enough to set aside a statutory demand

An undetermined claim for insurance indemnity was declared not to be sufficient to set aside a statutory demand.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Setting Aside Statutory Demands . . . on Conditions, we reported on a case which highlighted that just because an uncertain offsetting claim is enough to set aside a statutory demand, it does not necessarily mean that the debtor company will get entirely off the hook.

The recent case of Primestyle Pty Ltd v Fluhler (2017) WASC 296 showcases another scenario where the debtor company has loosened the creditor's hook by reason of a subsequent agreement reached between the parties but was unable to defeat the demand entirely despite an impending insurance indemnity.

The Facts

By a statutory demand issued to Primestyle Pty Ltd (Primestyle), Mr Fluhler claimed that he was owed four separate amounts pursuant to orders made by the State Administrative Tribunal. The four amounts, $1,400, $8,281.28, $42,524 and $10,285, totaling $62,490.28, were registered as judgments debts in the Magistrates Court. Primestyle applied to set aside the demand pursuant to s 459G of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from