Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 SEPTEMBER 2024

High Court to resolve disagreement over class closure orders

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Divide emerged between intermediate appellate courts on the question of power to make 'class closure' orders.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The High Court of Australia has granted special leave to appeal from the decision of the New South Wales Court of Appeal in Pallas v Lendlease [2024] NSWCA 83, indicating it will weigh in on the divide that has emerged between intermediate appellate courts on the question of power to make 'class closure' orders in representative proceedings.

Background

Constructive settlement discussions in 'open' class actions1 can be difficult because the parties do not know how many group members there are, nor the asserted value of their claims. To overcome this difficulty, parties (usually respondents) sometimes seek a 'class closure' order.

Typically, such orders:

  • require group members to 'register' their interest in participating in any settlement by a specified date (by providing details which help the parties to assess the value of their individual claim); and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

    Lawyers Weekly Law firm of the year 2021                  
Employer of Choice for Gender Equality (WGEA)

See more popular content from