Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 AUGUST 2025

Financing Of Australian Class Actions—Solicitors Common Fund Order Disallowed

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

The Situation: Australia's highest court has ruled on the question of whether lawyers in New South Wales ("NSW") can charge contingency fees in class action litigation in the Federal Court of Australia...

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Short

The Situation: Australia's highest court has ruled on the question of whether lawyers in New South Wales ("NSW") can charge contingency fees in class action litigation in the Federal Court of Australia (otherwise known as a solicitors' common fund order, or "SCFO"). The Federal Court, in answer to a question reserved to the Full Court, had ruled that lawyers could charge a SCFO.

The Result: In a 7–0 decision, the High Court of Australia in Kain v R&B Investments Pty Ltd [2025] HCA 28 held it was not permissible for NSW lawyers to charge a SCFO in Federal Court class action proceedings.

Looking Ahead: The financing of class actions is a major policy issue in Australia. The High Court has limited the fee options available to plaintiffs' lawyers in the Federal Court, while giving litigation funders greater clarity. The debate about how lawyers can charge is likely to continue, but as a legislative issue rather than a judicial one.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from