Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 AUGUST 2014

Expert witnesses, communications and legal professional privilege

The NSW Supreme Court has recently given some further guidance on the difficult subject of privilege in a communication.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Faith Laube
Faith Laube

In brief - Supreme Court decision in Sprayworx v Homag provides further guidance

The Supreme Court of NSW recently held that privilege in a communication will not be waived or lost if the communication has not influenced the content of an expert witness's final report.

Communications between expert witnesses and their instructing solicitors

In New South Wales, communications between an expert witness and their instructing solicitors are, as a general rule, not discoverable on the grounds of privilege. However there are significant exceptions to that rule.

The Supreme Court has recently given some further guidance on this difficult subject. In a recent case, Sprayworx Pty Ltd v Homag Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 833, the court decided that privilege in a communication will not be waived or lost if the communication has not influenced the content of the expert's final report, or may have influenced it but in relation only to form or peripheral matters.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from