Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JULY 2015

Discovery of electronic files in litigation: do you identify and preserve potentially discoverable documents early?

The obligation to disclose extends to all forms of documents, including purely electronic information and its metadata.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Focus: Integrated Medical Technology Pty Ltd and Anor v Gilbert and Ors [2015] QSC 124
Services: Dispute Resolution & Litigation, Intellectual Property & Technology
Industry Focus: Life Sciences & Healthcare

In any litigation, a party's obligation to disclose relevant documents can spark debate about what must be produced. This occurred in the recent case of Integrated Medical Technology Pty Ltd and Anor v Gilbert and Ors [2015] QSC 124 where the Supreme Court of Queensland considered whether, in the context of a copyright dispute about software and source code, various system and other electronic files needed to be disclosed.

The decision is a reminder to parties involved in copyright and other disputes that sometimes electronic files which are less obvious are still relevant, and must be produced. The case also demonstrates the importance of giving early consideration to some of the less obvious documents that may have

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from