Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 OCTOBER 2026

How Are Defamatory Imputations Formulated And Pleaded?

Defamatory imputations are the damaging meanings a publication conveys about a person, formulated by reading the whole publication as an ordinary reasonable recipient would. In Queensland, these imputations must be particularised in the concerns notice and adequately identified in the pleading. This article explains how defamatory imputations are distilled from publications, how ordinary implications differ from true innuendo...

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Article Summary

Defamatory imputations are the damaging meanings a publication conveys about a person.

In Queensland, they should clearly identify each distinct accusation, reflect the whole publication, and distinguish guilt from suspicion. True innuendo requires supporting external facts and recipients’ knowledge.

The meanings relied upon must be particularised in the concerns notice, subject to the allowance for substantially the same imputations, and adequately identified in the pleading.

Ambiguous or unsupported meanings can attract particulars requests or strike-out applications.

Using Favell and Chakravarti, our defamation solicitors explain formulation, pleading, amendments and the effect on truth defences. Serious reputational harm remains a separate requirement.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from