Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 JULY 2017

Disclosure Managment Plans: What does the Queensland Supreme Court expect?

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

The Court could relieve parties of ordinary disclosure obligations in favour of a tailored disclosure management plan.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Anyone involved in significant litigation will be all too familiar with the time and cost associated with disclosure. It's a task which can derail the expeditious resolution of a dispute.

The Queensland Supreme Court has shown it will relieve parties of their ordinary disclosure obligations in favour of a tailored disclosure management plan where appropriate. The purpose of a disclosure management plan is to limit the number of documents for review by setting out a proportionate and efficient approach to disclosure involving reasonable searches for documents.

Disclosure management plans are not new and were introduced into the Queensland disclosure landscape in 2012 via Supreme Court Practice Direction 11 of 2012.1 Although the Practice Direction provides some guidance as to the type of information to be included in a disclosure management plan, the precise content and level of detail required has largely been left to agreement between the parties (which is

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from