Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 AUGUST 2020

Defamation: The social media, social-distancing edition

Defamation law has failed to keep pace with the changing landscape – including the significant role of social media.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

With many of us working from home, we are increasingly relying on technology, including social media, to keep us connected. It is easy to forget that the increased use of social media (and the publication it relies on) exposes us to a greater risk of defamation claims (and potentially increases the damages flowing from those claims given the ease of widespread publication). It is also particularly topical given the NSW Court of Appeal's confirmation of the Voller decision1, and the implications that has for companies who have social media pages.

This article sets out a high-level overview of the operation of defamation law by reference to recent Australian social media cases. This first page-spread addresses the elements of a defamation claim – a defamatory imputation, which is published to a third party, and which is about the plaintiff. The second page of this article details some of the key decisions around damages (assuming no defence is made out, noting

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from