Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 DECEMBER 2011

D&O insurance policies: The Bridgecorp Case

The case may have serious consequences for Australian directors relying on D&O policies to fund their defence costs.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Jack Schmidtke
Jack Schmidtke

The High Court of New Zealand's recent decision in the Bridgecorp Case1 may have serious consequences for Australian directors seeking to rely on directors' and officers' insurance policies (D&O policies) to fund their defence costs in civil and criminal proceedings. The High Court found in the case that a statutory charge existed in favour of a potential claimant over monies payable to directors under a D&O policy. The decision has resulted in the insurer of the D&O policy being unable to advance monies to New Zealand directors for the directors' defence costs.

In light of the risk that the High Court's decision may be followed in Australian states and territories which have similar legislation, Australian directors and company officers should ensure that they have adequate cover for all likely claims and defence costs under their insurance policies.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from