Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JULY 2010

Cyclist Collides With a Metal Chain – Whether Obvious Risk Defence Under the Civil Liability Act Available

Case Note in the Court of Appeal decision of Council of the City of Greater Taree v Wells relating to whether a chain placed across a pathway was an obvious risk to a cyclist under the Civil Liability Act, 2002.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Judgment date: 1 July 2010

The Council of the City of Greater Taree v Daryl George Wells[2010] NSWCA 147

New South Wales Court of Appeal

In Brief

  • The Civil Liability Act , 2002 (CLA) does not define or delimit the circumstances in which a duty of care will arise. That remains the province of common law principles.
  • Section 5B is directed to whether a found duty of care has been breached and substantially restates the common law principles set out in Wyong Shire Council v Shirt
  • At common law the court is required to identify what a reasonable person in the position of the defendant would do by way of response to a reasonably foreseeable risk of injury. This is consistent with s 5B(1) of the CLA: Graham Barclay Oysters Pty Limited v Ryan

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from