Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 MAY 2011

Court supports CARS Assessor's brief reasons

The opportunities for successfully challenging a CARS Assessment remain limited. The insurer sought to set aside the CARS decision of Assessor Cowley.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Laurinda Wellings
Laurinda Wellings

Judgment date: 29 April 2011

Allianz Australia Insurance Limited v Kerr [2011] NSWSC 347

Supreme Court of NSW – Justice Hislop

In Brief

The opportunities for successfully challenging a CARS Assessment remain limited.

Background

The insurer sought to set aside the CARS decision of Assessor Cowley. The four grounds of error submitted by the insurer were that the Assessor:

  1. rejected a causation finding of a MAS Assessor and either found the injury causally related to the subject accident or failed to state reasons on the issue;
  2. awarded a buffer of $200,000 without explanation, reasoning or attempt to comply with the s 126 criteria;
  3. awarded past care without addressing the statutory threshold and/or failed to state reasons for the award;

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from