Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 MAY 2014

Causation and reliance in securities class actions: Halliburton v EPJ Fund

Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Contributor
Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth

Corrs Chambers Westgarth is Australia’s leading independent law firm. We provide exceptional legal...

View firm profile
Explore more from Corrs Chambers Westgarth

This recent US petition could encourage practitioners to reflect on how securities class actions are argued in Australia.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A recent petition to the Supreme Court of the United States could fundamentally change securities class action litigation in the US, and encourage practitioners to reflect on the way securities class actions are argued in Australia.

The Supreme Court of the United States (Supreme Court) has recently heard a petition in Halliburton Co. v. Erica P. John Fund, Inc that has fundamentally challenged the economic theory that has shaped securities class actions in the US for the last 30 years. The Supreme Court's consideration of proving causation and reliance in class actions may provide crucial guidance on the application of statutory provisions on misleading and deceptive conduct to securities class actions in Australia.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from