Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 AUGUST 2014

Bun fight in a sandwich shop - is VCAT a court?

Expanding the definition of court in Victoria has implications for the interpretation of the Model Law across Australia.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Key Points:

Expanding the definition of "court" under the Victorian legislation has implications for the interpretation of the Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration across Australia.

In Subway Systems v Ireland [2014] VSCA 142, the Victorian Court of Appeal decided that the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) is a "court" for the purposes of the Commercial Arbitration Act 2011 (Vic). This decision adds another layer of difficulty for parties who have previously agreed to an arbitration clause to wriggle their way out of it by starting proceedings in VCAT.

The decision's significance is also magnified as it is a decision on the uniform Commercial Arbitration Act (CAA), which is enacted in all states and territories except the ACT, and modelled on the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. It is therefore likely to have implications for similar tribunals in

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from