Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 AUGUST 2013

Back to the future: High Court decisions confirm a more literal approach to statutory interpretation

The task of statutory construction must begin with close consideration of the text, free from policy considerations.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Key Points:

The task of statutory construction must begin with close consideration of the text itself, free from policy considerations.

In a series of recent decisions, the High Court has highlighted the primacy of the text in statutory interpretation and cautioned against placing reliance on extrinsic materials.

Start with the text

In several decisions the High Court has confirmed that the task of statutory interpretation "must begin with a consideration of the text itself" (see, for example, Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue (2009) 239 CLR 27 at [47]).

The primacy of the statutory text was emphasised in Australian Education Union v Department of Education and Children's Services [2012] HCA 3, where the High Court emphasised that purpose must be derived from the text of legislation, and not superimposed at the expense of the text. The case concerned a long-running dispute between the Australian Education Union and the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from