Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 MAY 2016

Australian Class Action Settlements Declined Due To Substantial Detriment To Class Members

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

The applicants and class members were investors in forestry plantation managed investment schemes that failed.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Key Points

  • The Federal Court of Australia refused to approve class action settlements in Kelly v Willmott Forests Ltd (in liquidation) (No 4) [2016] FCA 323 due to the settlement imposing a "significant detriment" on some class members by extinguishing their individual claims or defences, without any benefit in exchange and without adequate notice.
  • The decision further highlighted the uncertainty in Australian class actions around the finality of a class action settlement by adding to the debate on whether a settlement bound class members in relation to all of their claims, or only claims that formed part of the common issues.
  • The judgment drew attention to conflicts of interest that potentially arise in class actions, including conflicts between registered and non-participating class members' interests and between lawyers' interests in receiving legal fees and class members' interests in minimising those legal costs.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from