Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 APRIL 2016

Assessing damages in light of pre existing conditions: the test in Malec v Hutton affirmed

The case confirms that the assessment of past and future hypothetical facts must be done on the degree of probability.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In McQuitty v Midgley & Anor [2016] QSC 36, the plaintiff suffered multiple injuries, the most significant of which was a severe brain injury, as a result of a motor vehicle accident on 28 August 2003. He was 20 years of age at the time of the accident and brought an action via his litigation guardians claiming damages from the driver of the vehicle and the relevant CTP insurer.

Liability was admitted, however, quantum was in issue largely due to the plaintiff's troubled past in his short life leading up to the time of the accident. He had a very difficult upbringing, had been homeless, a habitual abuser of drugs and alcohol, involved in physical altercations and minor criminal offences, and engaged in what could be considered antisocial behaviour. The plaintiff was "quick to anger" and "lacked ordinary social skills". In addition, he had been involved in two prior significant motor vehicle accidents in 1999 and 2001.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from