Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 DECEMBER 2020

Appeal dismissed in shopping centre slip and fall claim

The shopping centre defence succeeded in the slip and fall case, as it could demonstrate a regular cleaning regime.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Maddison Ives
Maddison Ives

In brief - Carnemolla v Arcadia Funds Management Ltd [2020] NSWCA 308 affirms decision that a shopping centre did not breach its duty of care in a slip and fall case where the centre could demonstrate an adequate cleaning regime and the plaintiff could not establish there was water on the terrazzo floor

The duty owed by retailers and shopping centre operators to prevent slips and falls remains a high one. However, the recent affirmed decision of Carnemolla demonstrates that where a defendant has a good defence supported by a detailed incident report, they can succeed. If the facts do not support the position of the claimant, the court won't allow them to rely on expert opinion that goes too far, in this case - that an entire floor needs to be replaced.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from