Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JANUARY 2012

"Anshun" estoppel – the risks of waiting

With Anshun estoppel, a party can be prevented from making claims which should have been pursued in former proceedings.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

You have bought defective goods from a supplier, which has caused damage to your property. You refuse to pay for those goods, so the supplier sues you. You defend the claim on the basis that the supplier has given you defective goods, but you do not yet pursue your claim for damages - you want to see how this claim plays out before going to the cost of pursuing your own.

You reach a settlement with the supplier, which makes no reference to any claim for damages you might have, and then commence your own claim against the supplier. But is it too late? Have you lost the opportunity to pursue your claim?

In Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 45, the High Court laid down the principles which came to be known as "Anshun estoppel". In essence, a party can be prevented from making claims which should have been pursued in the former proceedings.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from