We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.
ARTICLE · 08 DECEMBER 2010
A new option to challenge an adjudicator’s decision made under the Security of Payment Act is confirmed
Norton Rose Fulbright Australia
The New South Wales Court of Appeal in Chase Oyster Bar v. Hamo Industries1 (Chase) has handed down an important decision about the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 1999 (NSW) (SoPA). The Court confirmed that the Supreme Court can set aside an adjudicator’s decision made under the SoPA where the necessary elements for the adjudicator to have power to make a decision do not exist. In legal speak, nothing in the SoPA removes the Supreme Court’s power to quash a decision m
AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
