Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 OCTOBER 2012

A Changing Costs Jurisdiction in the Planning & Environment Court

The P&E Court's power to award costs will come in line with other courts, by providing that costs follow the event.

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

For the last 22 years, the general rule in relation to costs in the Planning and Environment Court has been that each party bear its own costs. The Court has had a discretion to award costs in certain circumstance (usually if it determined that the proceedings were frivolous or vexatious), however this discretion was sparingly exercised.

The existing costs regime has facilitated a jurisdiction in which those who could not ordinarily afford to take the risk of being lumbered with a costs order in the event they were unsuccessful at trial, can actively participate. It is common place for affected residents or land owners who had made properly made submissions against a development application to exercise their rights to appeal an approval issued by Council to the Planning and Environment Court, often without representation by solicitors. For Council's, who are automatically party to most proceedings before the Planning and Environment Court, the existing costs regime

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from