Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 APRIL 2009

“Execution” - Reference To Signature Or Performance Of Contract? (Italian Bottle Case No 2)

In these proceedings, an Italian bottle manufacturer appealed a decision by the SA District Court to stay proceedings .

AustraliaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Vetreria Etrusca SRL v Kingston Estate Wines Pty Ltd [2008] SASC 75

  • Order refusing stay confirmed when wording of jurisdiction clause giving foreign court jurisdiction was ambiguous.

In these proceedings, an Italian bottle manufacturer appealed a decision by the SA District Court to stay proceedings .

Kingston claimed damages against the appellant for breach of contract by reason of the supply of faulty products. Vetreria sought to stay those proceedings on the basis of a jurisdiction clause. At issue in this judgment was what meaning should be given to the word "execution" in a jurisdiction clause. The appellant, Vetreria, submitted that this term referred to the performance of the contract and not the formal signing or adoption of it.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from