Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 DECEMBER 2014

Tobacco plain packaging laws: the Australian experience

It is interesting to review how the Australian High Court dealt with the Australian Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011.

AustraliaIntellectual Property

Introduction

With intellectual property increasingly forming a greater part of private wealth, it is interesting to review how the Australian High Court dealt with the Australian Tobacco Plain Packaging Act 2011 ("the TPP Act"), which required retail tobacco products to be sold in plain packaging. The key issue for the High Court (the Australian equivalent of the US Supreme Court) was whether the TPP Act breached section 51(xxxi) of the Australian constitution. The case was JT International SA v Commonwealth of Australia; British American Tobacco Australasia Ltd & Ors v The Commonwealth of Australia ("the Plain Packaging Case").

The parties

The plaintiffs in the Plain Packaging Case were tobacco companies which manufactured, packaged and sold tobacco products. The TPP Act prevented the plaintiffs from exploiting their intellectual property rights on the packaging of their tobacco products which they had previously enjoyed (including the use of trade marks, and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from