Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 AUGUST 2019

Case Note: H Lundbeck A/S v Sandoz Pty Ltd [2019] APO 18 - patent licence

Patentees need to be aware that a third party can apply for protection against exploitation by a compulsory licence.

AustraliaIntellectual Property

In the recent Australian Patent Office decision of H Lundbeck A/S v Sandoz Pty Ltd [2019] APO 18 (11 April 2019), Sandoz was successful in its application for a compulsory licence to protect its exploitation of Lundbeck's Australian Patent No. 623144 ("the Escitalopram Patent").

Background to the Case

Lundbeck's blockbuster antidepressant, escitalopram, marketed as Lexapro®, has been the subject of extensive patent litigation in Australia over the past decade. The Escitalopram Patent claims the (+)-enantiomer of citalopram per se and its methods of preparation. Citalopram is a racemic mixture of the (+) and (-)-enantiomers, marketed by Lundbeck as Cipramil®, and is the subject of an earlier Lundbeck patent.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from