Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JANUARY 2017

Immigration - Whats News - 17 January 2017

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

The newsletter includes summaries and links to recent cases relating to visa applications and immigration into Australia.

AustraliaImmigration

Cases

Salama v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 2
MIGRATION – cancellation of visa under s 109 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – online visa application form - where appellant answered "divorced" to question as to relationship status - whether Tribunal erred in considering whether the appellant's answer was "incorrect" within the meaning of s 101 – whether answer of "married" on online visa application form refers to marriage legally recognised under Australian law – where Tribunal made findings as to what was the most correct answer but no finding as to whether the answer was "incorrect" – where finding that answer was "at least misleading" or technically correct does not equate to finding it is incorrect - appeal allowed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from