Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MAY 2025

Political expression and workplace protections – defining the boundaries

Holding Redlich
Holding Redlich
Contributor
Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich

Holding Redlich is a large national commercial firm with offices in Melbourne, Canberra, Sydney,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Holding Redlich

Gillham v Melbourne Symphony Orchestra Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 458.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

The intersection of workplace rights, freedom of expression and independent contracting is once again under judicial scrutiny in the recent case of Gillham v Melbourne Symphony Orchestra Pty Ltd [2025] FCA 458. This proceeding raises important questions about whether Australia's workplace laws extend protections to independent contractors who engage in political expression under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act). As the case proceeds to trial, it has the potential to reshape how political speech is treated in professional environments, particularly for independent contractors.

Case background: Gillham v Melbourne Symphony Orchestra Pty Ltd

In this case, the applicant was an international concert pianist who was scheduled to perform 1 recital and 1 concert with the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra (MSO). For the purposes of this hearing, the Court acknowledged that the applicant was not a common law employee but rather an independent contractor.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

This publication does not deal with every important topic or change in law and is not intended to be relied upon as a substitute for legal or other advice that may be relevant to the reader's specific circumstances. If you have found this publication of interest and would like to know more or wish to obtain legal advice relevant to your circumstances please contact one of the named individuals listed.

See more popular content from