Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 APRIL 2016

Medical Panel's mystifying workers' comp decision overturned

The decision is a reminder that the Medical Panel must set out how it arrived at its opinion in its statement of reasons.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

Petrogas Pty Ltd v Doolan & Ors [2016] VSC 46

In February 2016 the Supreme Court overturned the Medical Panel's decision in Petrogas Pty Ltd v Shane Doolan & Ors about a worker's capacity for alternative clerical duties.

This decision is a reminder that the Medical Panel must set out how it arrived at its opinion in its statement of reasons. If the Panel provides inadequate reasons for its opinion, this will often amount to an error of law on the face of the record. It is important to carefully examine the Panel's reasons for opinion to ascertain what evidence its conclusions were based on, and whether the reasons disclose a logical path of reasoning.

Background

Mr Doolan suffered an injury to his right knee in the course of his employment as a tanker driver with Petrogas Pty Ltd. He lodged a compensation claim and received payments of compensation and medical expenses.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from