Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 AUGUST 2017

LimeLight Issue No. 69: Costs in Fair Work proceedings

These cases are useful overviews of relevant principles a Court will apply in exercising its discretion to order costs.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

Introduction

Court proceedings under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act) invariably leave each party bearing its own costs, even if successful.

The recent decisions of Cheng v Western Pursuits Trust (No. 2)1 (Cheng) and Cross v Harbour City Ferries Pty Ltd t/as Harbour City Ferries & Ors (no.2)2 (Cross) provide useful overviews of the relevant principles a Court will apply in exercising its discretion to order costs in such proceedings.

These issues have significant implications for employers when defending such proceedings, which are most commonly general protections ("adverse action") claims, and their insurers as to drafting policy terms, setting premiums as well as reserving and setting defence strategy in EPL claims.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from