Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 DECEMBER 2012

Consent orders: Newcrest Mining Limited v Thornton [2012] HCA 60

Excluding consent orders from the operation of s 7(1)(b) was held not inconsistent with the purpose of the provision.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

Yesterday a majority of the High Court of Australia held that s 7(1)(b) of the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence and Tortfeasors' Contribution) Act 1947 (WA) ("the Act"), which provides that a person bringing more than one action in respect of damage suffered as the result of a tort cannot recover more than "the amount of the damages awarded by the judgment first given", does not apply to a consent judgment entered to give effect to an agreement to settle a proceeding.

In 2004 the respondent injured his knee in the course of his employment at a mine site in Western Australia. The respondent claimed workers' compensation payments and common law damages from his employer. The claim was settled in 2007 by way of a consent judgment entered in the District Court of Western Australia, with no admission as to liability in respect of any cause of action. In 2008, the respondent commenced proceedings for negligence against the appellant, which owned and operated the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from