Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 AUGUST 2017

Asbestos case note - Inability to claim the pension

The plaintiff claimed damages for pension he would lose, for the years between likely death and normal life expectancy.

AustraliaEmployment and HR

On 22 August 2017, Judge Russell of the Dust Diseases Tribunal handed down his judgments in Dib v Amaca Pty Ltd [2017] NSWDDT 6 and Londos v Amaca Pty Limited [2017] NSWDDT 7. The cases were not related to each other, but had an important common issue.

These cases have been keenly watched by the asbestos community, as they contained the unusual feature of the plaintiff asserting that he should be entitled to receive damages for the pension he would otherwise have been paid in the "lost years" (the time between his likely date of death, and normal life expectancy).

Many of the facts in the cases, and therefore the judgments, are unremarkable. The plaintiffs had no difficulty establishing that they were exposed to James Hardie products, and there were also few unusual features about the mesothelioma from which they both suffered.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from