Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MAY 2012

Acceleration and bending the truth - consequences for a worker's damages

A discussion of Hosmer v Cook Shire Council [2012] QSC.

AustraliaEmployment and HR
Vanessa Price (Formerly With DibbsBarker)
Vanessa Price (Formerly With DibbsBarker)
Author LinkedIn connections

Focus: Hosmer v Cook Shire Council [2012] QSC 91
Services: Insurance
Industry Focus: Insurance

Hosmer v Cook Shire Council [2012] QSC 91

The judgement for this quantum only trial looks at the level of discounting applied to damages where a plaintiff was found to have significant credibility issues; a history of both short term employment and deliberate attempts to mislead medical assessors, his own occupational therapist and Centrelink; and a pre-existing injury.

Facts

The plaintiff, Mr Hosmer, suffered an injury to the lumbar spine when carrying out a task of striking pegs into hard ground by repeatedly swinging a sledge hammer over his head, in the course of his employment with Cook Shire Council. The Council admitted liability at trial. The dispute at trial was the significance of Mr Hosmer's pre-existing back condition, and Mr Hosmer's credibility issues in assessing the quantum of loss flowing from that work related injury.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from