One Essex Court

Greg specialises in competition law and all aspects of intellectual property law, encompassing both contentious and non-contentious matters. Prior to coming to the Bar, Greg was an Assistant Manager in the Pensions Actuarial department at KPMG LLP. Greg’s current and recent instructions include: Ad Tech Collective Action LLP v Alphabet Inc – acting for the class representative in opt-out collective proceedings before the Competition Appeal Tribunal alleging that Google has abused its dominant position in online advertising markets to the detriment of online publishers (led by Robert O’Donoghue KC and Gerry Facenna KC). Utilita Energy Ltd v PayPoint Plc – acted for Utilita in a claim for damages before the Competition Appeal Tribunal alleging that PayPoint had abused its dominant position in the market for the provision of over-the-counter pre-payment services to energy suppliers (led by Derek Spitz). DKH Retail Ltd v City Football Group Ltd – acted for Superdry in trade mark infringement proceedings against Manchester City Football Club relating to branding appearing on Premier League football training kit (led by Philip Roberts KC). Cabo Concepts Ltd v MGA Entertainment (UK) Ltd – acted for the Claimant in a claim involving alleged infringements of competition law and unjustified threats of patent infringement, and a defence based on passing off (led by Ronit Kreisberger KC and Mark Chacksfield KC). Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen v Meta Platforms Inc – acted for the class representative in opt-out collective proceedings before the Competition Appeal Tribunal alleging that Meta has abused its dominant position in the market for personal social networking services to the detriment of users (led by Robert O’Donoghue KC and Ronit Kreisberger KC). Blackfridge SC Ltd v Tether Operations Ltd – acted for the Defendant in trade mark infringement proceedings before the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court relating to stablecoin crypto assets (led by Philip Roberts KC).

Joyce has a broad commercial practice, with particular experience in taking large and complex disputes to trial. Her work covers a wide range of areas, including energy, banking, civil fraud and shareholder and SPA disputes. Recent litigation experience includes wins in Inspired Education Online Ltd v Crombie [2025] EWHC 1236 (Ch) (an SPA dispute), Maloney v Falcon VIII S.a r.l [2025] EWHC 240 (Comm) (an SHA dispute and one of The Lawyer’s Top 20 Cases of 2025), and Magomedov v TPG [2025] EWHC 59 (Comm) (summary judgment on a $13.8bn conspiracy claim). Joyce enjoys working as part of a team or as sole counsel.

Mehdi undertakes a broad range of commercial work and has experience of appearing both led and unled in the High Court. Core practice areas include (but are not limited to) banking and finance, derivatives, commodities and conflict of laws/jurisdiction. Appeared (with Adrian Beltrami QC, Anthony de Garr Robinson QC, Alexander Polley and Sandy Phipps) for the Defendant Bank, in The Libyan Investment Authority v Société Générale (listed in The Lawyers’ Top 20 Cases in 2017). In recent years, Mehdi’s practice has centered on complex derivatives disputes. In Banco Santander Totta v Carris [2016] 4 WLR 49 he appeared (with Laurence Rabinowitz QC, John Odgers QC and Simon Colton) in the first action heard before the newly-created Financial List, concerning the sale of interest rate swaps to Portuguese transport companies. In Marex Financial Limited v Creative Finance Ltd and Cosmorex Ltd [2014] 1 All ER (Comm) 122, he appeared (with Alain Choo Choy QC), where the Commercial Court considered the duties of a broker when closing out its client’s portfolio.Other notable involvements include: One Step (Support) Ltd v Karen Morris Garner & Ors [2015] IRLR 215; [2016] IRLR 435; [2016] 3 WLR 1281 (with Craig Orr QC), before the Supreme Court (October 2017) (Judgment pending) on the important issue of Wrotham Park damages; and in a regulatory / competition context: R (oao Albion Water Limited) v. OFWAT & Anr [2012] EWHC 2259 (Admin); and Albion Water Limited v. Dwr Cymru Cyfyngedig [2013] CAT 6 (with Thomas Sharpe QC and Matthew Cook) before both the Administrative Court and the Competition Appeal Tribunal.

Barrister specialising in commercial litigation and international commercial arbitration, with an established practice in civil fraud, construction, energy & natural resources and banking & financial services.

Camilla Bingham KC

Barrister specialising in commercial litigation. Her areas of practice include conflict of laws, contractual disputes, civil fraud, corporate insolvency and professional negligence. Camilla is admitted as a member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of the Eastern Caribbean (Virgin Islands) and is registered with the DIFC on the Register of Practitioners (Part II) in Dubai.

Nathaniel is an established and in-demand junior for heavyweight commercial litigation, banking & finance disputes and civil fraud claims. He is regularly instructed in complex and high-value matters, and has significant experience of both High Court litigation and arbitral proceedings. Recent experience includes: Acting for Ukrainian businessman Gennadiy Bogolyubov defending a USD 1.9 billion fraud claim brought by JSC Commercial Bank PrivatBank at trial over 13-weeks in the Chancery Division. The case was named by The Lawyer as one of its Top 20 cases of 2022. Successfully defending Mr Bogolyubov against a USD 300 fraud claim brought by Russian oil company PJSC Tatneft in a twelve-week Commercial Court trial. Defending a multi-billion dollar claim arising out of the Malaysian 1MDB scandal in parallel Commercial Court proceedings and a LCIA arbitration. Representing Dubai Islamic Bank in a significant dispute with the administrators of the NMC Group in parallel proceedings in the Abu Dhabi Global Market Court and an LCIA arbitration. Acting for litigation funder Vannin in a claim against the RBOS Shareholders Action Group (one of The Lawyer’s Top Cases of 2020). Notable past instructions include representing Citibank in the successful defence of a £2.3bn fraud claim brought by the Terra Firma private equity fund (one of The Lawyer’s Top Cases of 2016) and acting for Société Générale defending claims that high-value investments were procured by bribery in Libya (one of The Lawyer’s Top Cases of 2017). In 2018 he was named as one of The Lawyer’s ‘Hot 100’.

Barrister practising across a broad range of commercial work with a strong emphasis on advocacy.

Abra Bompas is recommended in Chambers & Partners Commercial Dispute Resolution, and in Who’s Who Legal for Company and Partnership. Her practice covers the broad spectrum of commercial dispute resolution in the High Court (both led and unled) and the Court of Appeal, as wells as in international arbitration. Abra often acts for clients in disputes arising in (but not limited to) the banking and finance sector (including insolvencies and mis-selling), in contractual claims across a range of industries, in share sale / warranty claims, shareholder actions and fraud claims. Abra was also seconded to the FSA (now FCA). In litigation, Abra is acting as part of the One Essex Court counsel team for the Claimant in SKAT v Solo Capital Partners LLP and Others. The Danish Customs and Tax Administration authority’s claim is for US$1.5 billion and has been brought against c. 100 defendants. It arises out of an alleged international conspiracy to deceive the authority. The claims are pleaded under English law, alternatively Danish law. The case was named one of “The Top 20 Cases of 2021” by The Lawyer. Abra acted successfully in the Commercial Court in Yukos Finance B.V. and Others v Lynch and Others [2019] EWHC 2621 (Comm). The Lawyer named the case one of “The Top 20 Cases of 2019”. The claim was for up to circa £35 million. The Yukos parties made claims under Russian law against five individuals arising out of the auctions of Yukos Oil in Russia in 2007. Abra acted for the Fifth Defendant, a senior former employee of a Russian investment bank. With Zoe O’Sullivan QC, Abra acted successfully for the McLaren group in CRS GT Limited v McLaren Automotive Limited and Others [2018] EWHC 3209 (Comm), an expedited Commercial Court dispute between the supercar manufacturer McLaren and one of its suppliers, CRS. CRS alleged that it had certain contractual rights in relation to two McLaren race cars which are eligible to race in the GT3 and GT4 race series respectively. The case involved a complex mandatory interim injunction.

Richard Boulton KC

Recognised as a leading silk at the Commercial Bar for high value claims, with particular expertise in offshore “fair value” disputes, IP damages enquiries, and the quantum aspects of investor/state and energy arbitrations. Richard has been instructed in seven s.238 “fair value” cases in the Cayman Islands Grand Court (including three full trials: Nord Anglia, FGL Holdings and most recently 58.com) and three s.106 “fair value” disputes in Bermuda, including Jardine. He recently acted for Warner-Lambert and Pfizer in the combined action by numerous parties for compensation following from the pregabalin/Lyrica litigation, with hearings including the counterfactual assumptions trial ([2021] EWHC 2182 (Ch)). He has led the quantum aspects of several bilateral investment treaty disputes, and acted as counsel in other international arbitration disputes in London, Paris, Hong Kong, Singapore and Tokyo. Significant advocacy experience, including leading (as a junior) a five week civil fraud trial in the Commercial Court. He has particular expertise in matters involving expert witnesses, and has cross examined experts across a range of disciplines (engineering, banking, accountancy, environmental waste, shipping, share valuation etc).

Jonathan Bremner KC

Jonathan Bremner KC specialises in tax. His practice focuses on complex, substantial tax litigation and advisory work. Jonathan acts for clients from a wide range of industry sectors, including large multinationals, major listed companies, owner-managed businesses and high-net worth individuals, as well as local and central government. Recent cases include FII GLO, Prudential Assurance Co, RFC 2012 PLC (Supreme Court); Irish Bank Resolution Corp, LIFE Services, Smith & Nephew, MG Rover, Farnborough Airport, Newey (Court of Appeal); Royal Bank of Canada, Urenco Chemplants, London Luton Hotel BPRA Property Fund, BAT Industries (Upper Tribunal); Post-Prudential Appeals GLO, Hannover Leasing, LINPAC, Panayi (FTT). Recent advisory work includes double taxation treaties, permanent establishments, business structuring issues, company reconstructions, transfer pricing, capital allowances, partnership taxation, employment and personal taxes, VAT (e.g. supply classification issues, scope of exemptions, input tax recovery, partial exemption, claims to recover overdeclared VAT).

Alexander Brown

Alexander has extensive experience of complex and high-value commercial litigation and international arbitration. He has a wealth of advocacy experience, having appeared in the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, in numerous High Court trials and in arbitral proceedings under a variety of rules. Alexander has particular expertise in international fraud cases and injunctions, including worldwide freezing orders, anti-suit injunctions, search orders and disclosure orders. He is also a leading practitioner on the Commercial Agents (Council Directive) Regulations 1993. Alexander’s cases from the past year include UniCredit v RusChemAlliance [2025] 2 All ER 125 (Supreme Court); Kompaktwerk v LivePerson [2025] Bus LR 474; Xenfin v GFG [2025] EWHC 172 (Ch); and Xtellus v DL Invest Group [2025] EWHC 1989.

Patricia undertakes a broad range of commercial work, both contentious and advisory. She has substantial experience of complex, high-value litigation and alternative dispute resolution (including domestic and international arbitration and expert determination), particularly in the field of banking and finance. She has appeared in the Court of Appeal and the High Court as part of a larger team and has also acted as sole counsel in both the High Court and County Courts.Notable and recent involvements include:MetLife Seguros de Retiro SA v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association [2015] EWHC 463 (Comm)For JP Morgan Chase (with David Wolfson QC) before the Commercial Court (10 days), in a claim concerning the sum paid on the redemption of structured CER-linked notes.M&G Broad European Loan Fund Ltd & Ors v Hayfin Capital Luxco 2 Sarl & OrsFor the claimant ROFR holders (with David Wolfson QC) in proceedings concerning the validity of transfers of shares and subordinated debt under the terms of a Shareholders’ Deed. See the related judgment M&G Broad European Loan Fund Ltd v Hayfin Capital Luxco 2 Sarl [2017] EWHC 1756 (Ch).LCIA ProceedingsFor the Respondent company (with David Wolfson QC), defending claims of bribery and corruption in connection with the acquisition of valuable mining rights in western Africa.Rawlinson and Hunter Trustees SA v. SFO; Tchenguiz & Anr v. SFOFor the Serious Fraud Office (with Charles Graham QC and Simon Colton), in the highly publicised proceedings before the Commercial Court, defending allegations of malicious prosecution, misfeasance in public office, trespass, false imprisonment and breaches of the Human Rights Act. The 12-week trial scheduled for October 2014 was ultimately settled. See the following related judgments concerning Public Interest Immunity and Legal Professional Privilege [2014] EWHC 1102 (Comm) and Security for Costs [2014] EWHC 1103 (Comm). Currently acting for the Serious Fraud Office (with Simon Colton QC) as respondent to various applications in the related but separate Tchenguiz v Grant Thornton proceedings.

Stanley Burnton

Commercial arbitration, as arbitrator.

Oliver has a broad commercial practice, encompassing litigation, arbitration and advice. Oliver is currently acting for Barclays (with Jeffery Onions QC, David Quest QC and Alexander Polley) in PCP Capital Partners LLP v Barclays Bank, one of The Lawyer’s Top 20 Cases of 2020. PCP claims damages of over £1 billion arising from its alleged role in a capital raising conducted by the bank in 2008. A 10 week trial took place in the summer/autumn of 2020. Other current and recent work includes: Bilta (UK) Ltd & Ors v (1) RBS plc and (2) Mercuria Energy Europe Trading Ltd [2017] EWHC 3535 (Ch): For the Claimants (with Christopher Parker QC and Orlando Gledhill QC) in a 6-week trial in June/July 2018 of dishonest assistance claims relating to carbon emissions allowance (EUA) trading that formed part of an €88 million missing trader VAT fraud. RREEF European Value Added Fund v Deutsche Alternative Asset Management (UK) (Ltd) (Comm) (2014-2016): For the Claimant (with Daniel Toledano QC and Orlando Gledhill) in a claim for over €150 million for breach of contract and/or gross negligence by a fund manager. Mercuria Energy Trading Pte Ltd & Anor v Citibank NA & Anor [2015] EWHC 1481 (Comm): Acting for the defendant Citibank (with Daniel Toledano QC and Richard Mott) in expedited proceedings arising under master agreements for commodity (metal) ‘repo’ transactions, including counterclaims for over US$250 million and declaratory relief. Pathfinder Minerals Plc & Ors v Veloso & Ors [2012] 2856 (Comm) Acting for the Claimants (with Craig Orr QC) successfully at first instance and in the Court of Appeal ([2013] Civ 505) in a claim for declaratory and injunctive relief arising out of a dispute over mineral rights in Mozambique valued at over US$ 500 million.

Eleanor Campbell

Eleanor has been involved in a number of high profile trials including: Tangent Investments Ltd v. MF Global UK Ltd & Anr [2009] 2 All ER (Comm) 589, which saw the first claim of its kind in which damages for lost profits were awarded to a trader; Berezovsky v. Abramovich [2012] EWHC 2463 (Comm), and most recently Glenn v Watson, a three month trial in the Chancery Division arising out of a proposed £129 million investment in UK property.Eleanor’s practice comprises all aspects of commercial litigation. For example, she recently acted for the third party respondent to an interim third party debt order in proceedings for the discharge of that order on grounds that (amongst other things) the debt was situated in India: Hardy Exploration & Production (India) Inc v Government of India v India Infrastructure Finance Company (UK) Limited [2018] EWHC 1916 (Comm); [2018] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 331Eleanor has acted as sole advocate before numerous arbitral tribunals constituted (variously) under ICC, LCIA and ad hoc UNCITRAL rules and (with leader) of SIAC. Eleanor has also acted as sole counsel in numerous proceedings in the High Court. She speaks and reads French, and has appeared before an international tribunal where this skill-set has been utilised.

David undertakes a broad range of commercial work and has extensive experience of working in various forums, including the High Court (both led and unled), the Court of Appeal (again, both led and unled), the Privy Council, the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court, and arbitrations. He is admitted as a member of the bar of the British Virgin Islands. In the past year, David has acted on, amongst other things, the mammoth Magomedov claim, one of the largest conspiracy claims by value ever to come before the English courts, the sprawling Koza litigation, which has already been to the Court of Appeal four times and the Supreme Court once, and Crane Bank, a claim relating to the contested resolution and sale of a Ugandan bank by the Bank of Uganda. Notable cases in which David has acted beyond that include the Cukurova litigation (over the ownership and control of Turkcell, a leading Turkish telecoms company), the Peak Hotels dispute (over the ownership and control of the Aman Resorts hotel group), Novatrust v Kea (a dispute over a private equity investment vehicle and the first derivative action on behalf of a foreign company that has been permitted to proceed before the English courts), and Goldman Sachs v Novo Banco (an $800m+ claim which raises issues under the European Banking Resolution and Recovery and Credit Institutions Winding Up Directives). David also maintains a busy advisory practice, and regularly advises on matters relating to banking, energy, the financial markets, civil fraud, arbitration enforcement and more.

David Cavender KC

Barrister specialising in all aspects of commercial dispute resolution in both litigation and international arbitration. Expertise in but not limited to: banking and financial services, commercial contracts (including agency), company law insolvency, contractual building disputes, insurance and reinsurance, injunctions, international and domestic sale of goods, and professional negligence with extensive experience of conducting trials.

Alain Choo Choy KC

Barrister practising across the broad spectrum of commercial dispute resolution (both litigation and domestic and international arbitration). Expertise in areas including, but not limited to: banking and financial services; civil fraud (including cross border fraud and interim relief applications); energy and natural resources; and company and joint venture (including shareholders and M&A) disputes. For more detail, see profile at https://www.oeclaw.co.uk/barristers/full-cv/alain-choo-choy-kc.

Gideon Cohen

Barrister specialising in commercial litigation and arbitration, including all forms of contractual disputes, civil fraud, banking disputes, professional negligence, agency, sale of goods, economic torts, financial services and conflicts of laws. Recent notable cases include Magomedov v TPG and ors; ENRC v Serious Fraud Office; Various Claimants v G4S plc; Jinxin v Aser Media.

Matthew Cook KC

Matthew Cook specialises in all aspects of commercial dispute resolution in litigation, international and domestic arbitration, expert determination and ADR. He has significant experience in (but not limited to) disputes arising in the fields of administrative and public law, banking and finance, commodities, commercial contracts, competition and EU law, company law, corporate and individual insolvency law, energy and natural resources, financial services, professional negligence and industry regulation in general. He is also experienced in applications for injunctive relief (including anti-suit).

Michael practises across a wide range of commercial law, with a particular interest in banking and finance, energy, shareholders, and disputes with a technical or scientific aspect. He undertakes advisory and litigation work, both in the courts (principally the High Court and the Court of Appeal) and in arbitration. He also sits as an arbitrator. Current ongoing matters include the diesel emissions litigation, concerning the alleged inclusion of prohibited defeat devices in motor vehicles, and the SKAT litigation, a £1.4 billion claim in relation to alleged fraudulent applications for tax refunds. Other recent matters have included a dispute between Shell and Greenpeace relating to the boarding of a vessel at sea; an $800m claim relating to allegedly fraudulent transactions in relation to Russian loans and bonds; and various cases concerning battery storage projects and cryptocurrency investments.

Rhodri Davies KC

Barrister specialising in banking, professional negligence and commercial litigation; recent work includes appearing for Kleinwort Benson in Kleinwort Benson v Lincoln (abolition of the mistake of law rule in restitution); acting for the liquidators of Barings in the claims against the auditors of the Barings group; acting for the RAC in the litigation arising out of the de-mutualisation of its motoring services business; advising Unilever Pension Fund in its claim against Mercury Asset Management.

Anthony de Garr Robinson KC

Practice encompasses complex commercial cases of every kind, ranging from the fields of banking & finance (including securitisation, investment and regulatory claims and insurance business transfers), company law (including shareholder disputes), and fraud (including conspiracy and unlawful interference claims) on the one hand to trust and fiduciary claims, employment disputes and group litigation on the other. Has considerable experience of international litigation, including jurisdictional disputes and cross border asset tracing. Has appeared before the courts of Gibraltar, the BVI and the Bahamas, and frequently acts in international arbitrations. Has acted as an English law expert in proceedings in several jurisdictions. Sits as an arbitrator. Several of his cases have been singled out as ‘cases of the year’ by major guides. Recent cases include: Hotel Portfolio II UK Ltd (In Liquidation) v Ruhan [2023] EWCA Civ 1120. [2024] 2 All E.R. 903; Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers and others v Tesco Stores Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 978, [2023] 1 All E.R. 326; Re Prudential Assurance Company Ltd [2020] EWCA Civ 1626, [2021] Lloyd's Rep. I.R. 623; Re Edwardian Group Ltd [2019] 1 BCLC 171; and Bluewaters Communications v Bayerische Landesbank, Bernard Ecclestone & Anor.

Marcos Dracos KC

Marcos Dracos KC has a broad commercial practice covering a diverse range of sectors including energy, construction/engineering, banking, technology, insurance, acquisitions, sanctions, investment treaty arbitration and civil fraud/economic torts. His practice focuses on international arbitration, but he also frequently appears before the English and Cypriot courts, in commercial disputes, arbitration related claims, jurisdiction challenges, injunctions, and disclosure applications. Marcos has experience (as both counsel and arbitrator) in all major arbitral institutions and seats. He is also a member of the ICC Court of Arbitration. Marcos has a PhD from the University of Cambridge where he also taught contract law. He is an associate lecturer at the law department of the University of Cyprus, teaching Civil Procedure & Evidence.

Barrister specialising in commercial law and appearing regularly in the High Court, led and in his own right, particularly in cases in which competition, shareholder rights and sports law issues arise.

Steven Elliott KC

King’s Counsel specialising in commercial litigation and arbitration, including all forms of contract dispute, fraud, restitution, banking and financial services, and matters involving companies and trusts; Professor, Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore.

Laurence Emmett KC

Laurence Emmett’s practice extends over the full range of issues that arise in commercial disputes, including both litigation and international arbitration. His experience covers issues of contractual interpretation, jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments and injunctive relief. He has particular knowledge of the energy industry (including hydrocarbon-based and renewable resources), banking and finance and the pharmaceutical industry. Beyond our core practice areas, Laurence has particular interest and experience in fine art disputes. His recent work includes Golubovich v Golubovich (dispute over the ownership of a valuable collection of artworks and antiquities – see most recently the decision on jurisdiction, [2022] EWHC 1605 (Ch)); Bilta UK Ltd v Tradition Financial Services Ltd (claim brought in relation to VAT fraud relating to EU carbon credits, carried out in 2009 – see [2022] EWHC 723 (Ch)); and Cardiorentis AG v IQVIA Ltd (a claim relating to the conduct of a clinical trial relating to a drug put forward as a treatment for heart failure – see [2022] EWHC 250 (Comm)). He has also been instructed in a number of high-value international energy arbitration and has acted for FCA enforcement in relation to investigations and disciplinary matters.

Michael Fealy KC

Barrister specialising in commercial law.

International Commercial Arbitrator; Justice of Appeal in the Cayman Islands’ Court of Appeal. Previously a Justice of the High Court of England and Wales, sitting in the Commercial Court 2002 – August 2014; Deputy Judge in the Hong Kong High Court 2016 – 2020; Justice of the DIFC Court of Justice (Dubai) 2015 – 2023.

Daniel Fletcher

Dan’s practice covers the full range of commercial litigation, arbitration, and advisory work. He specialises in complex, high-value disputes, particularly those with international elements. He has substantial experience in the DIFC and ADGM courts. Before joining chambers, Dan was an associate in the litigation and arbitration group of White & Case (London). While there, he represented a wide range of clients in LCIA and ICC arbitrations across the energy, commercial real estate, and telecommunications sectors. Before joining White & Case, Dan completed the Oxford BCL, achieving first place in all four of his subjects. He also completed a training contract with the leading Australian firm King & Wood Mallesons. For more details, including of recent cases, please see his profile here: https://www.oeclaw.co.uk/barristers/profile/daniel-fletcher.

Henry Forbes Smith KC

Henry Forbes Smith practices international commercial litigation and arbitration. He is recommended by Chambers & Partners (Banking and Finance) and Legal 500 (Banking and Finance and Civil Fraud). Henry is also admitted in New Zealand (1997) and New York (2001), and practised New York law with Davis Polk before coming to the bar in 2005. He acted in Lomas, the leading case on the ISDA Master Agreement. Henry has a doctorate in the conflict of laws and is often instructed specifically to advise on jurisdiction or on choice of law and the presentation of foreign law. He has been responsible for the presentation of Russian law in many of the major Russian cases in recent years, including Tajik Aluminium and Berezovsky v. Abramovich. Henry also has a substantial arbitration practice, including under LCIA, ICC, SIAC, ICDR, UNCITRAL rules. He also sits arbitrator.

James Fox undertakes a broad range of commercial work in line with Chambers’ practice areas. James has been engaged in a number of market leading civil fraud cases, with claims for in excess of £1 billion. These include the 93-day trial in the Autonomy litigation, which the Judge noted “may rank amongst the longest and most complex in English legal history” and resulted in a 1200 page judgment which “may well be unparalleled”.

Barrister specialising in commercial litigation and international arbitration.

Barrister specialising in international commercial arbitration. Regularly appointed arbitrator in international arbitrations as sole arbitrator, chairman and as party appointee. Substantial experience as arbitrator and representing parties in a wide range of commercial disputes, including joint venture agreements, construction contracts, defence contracts, the oil industry, the financial services and banking sector, insurance disputes, share acquisition agreements and warranty claims.

Constantine Fraser

Constantine practices across the whole range of commercial disputes. He is currently instructed (with Simon Colton KC and Daniel Benedyk) on Jinxin v Aser, a 10-week fraud trial arising from allegations of bribery in the acquisition of Italian Serie A football broadcast rights. Other notable recent cases include acting (with Niranjan Venkatesan KC) for the successful defendants in Invest Bank v El Husseini [2024] EWHC 2976 (Comm), a claim brought under s.423 Insolvency Act 1986, at which Constantine appeared at the 4-week trial and at numerous interlocutories; and acting (with Tom Sharpe KC) in Havant Biogas v Ofgem, a claim for damages under Article 1 Protocol 1 ECHR. Constantine is happy accepting instructions in French or Italian. Before coming to the Bar, Constantine covered European economic policy and political economy for a leading financial markets forecasting company.

Malcolm Gammie KC

Malcolm Gammie started his tax career in the City with Linklaters & Paines. After a period of tax policy work at the Confederation of British Industry, he was among the first lawyers to work in the tax field with a leading accounting firm. At KMG Thomson McLintock (now part of KPMG), he was the first Director of the firm's National Tax Office before becoming its Director of National Tax Services. In 1985 he returned to Linklaters & Paines and from 1987 to 1997 was one of its senior tax partners. He moved to the Bar in 1997 to concentrate on tax litigation and advisory work and took silk in 2002. Over his career, Malcolm has gained experience in most aspects of taxation and is noted as a leading practitioner in the commercial, European and international taxation fields. Malcolm Gammie is among the leading advocates at the Revenue Bar. He has represented both His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs and taxpayers is a series of high profile disputes, including for HMRC the Eclipse 35 and Ingenious film scheme litigation. His experience as a solicitor in preparing cases, including handling both documentary and witness evidence, provides him with a unique insight into the conduct of litigation. At Linklaters, he had charge of cases before the Tax Tribunals as well as before both the High Court and the Court of Appeal. As an advocate he has represented taxpayers and the Revenue at all stages of tax appeals including the House of Lords, the Supreme Court and European Court of Justice. He is noted for his painstaking attention to detail on all aspects of the litigation process. He has also assisted in negotiations with the Revenue leading to the satisfactory settlement of disputes. In addition to his substantial litigation practice Malcolm also advises on all aspects of commercial, European and international taxation, for both incorporated and unincorporated entities, their shareholders and employees. He covers all the main direct taxes, value added tax, national insurance, stamp and other duties, and the related European and administrative law. Malcolm's clients include many leading UK and foreign multi-national companies, banks, insurance companies and other financial institutions. Malcom has also acted as an expert in litigation in New Zealand, The USA and The UK. He is one of the UK's arbitrators under the EU Arbitration Convention and has served in the capacity as both a chairman abd member of an a arbitral panel.

James has a diverse commercial practice across Chambers’ full range of specialisms, with a particular focus on civil fraud, commodities, trade finance and other banking disputes. He has appeared in the High Court, most commonly the Commercial Court and the Chancery Division, as well as in the Court of Appeal and arbitral proceedings under a variety of rules (including LCIA, SIAC, UNCITRAL and LMAA). James has significant experience in high value, complex commercial disputes, with recent cases including Vik v Deutsche Bank AG, Alfa-Bank v Kipford Ventures Limited, and various confidential arbitrations. He also regularly acts as sole counsel, both against other juniors and against opponents in silk. James is frequently instructed in interim applications, which are often urgent, including for freezing injunctions, disclosure orders, debarring orders and orders in support of arbitral proceedings. He is especially familiar with making and resisting such applications against the background of allegations of fraud, having spent six months on secondment at a civil fraud litigation boutique in his first year of practice.

Barrister, King’s Counsel, Bye-Fellow Peterhouse Cambridge, Preceptor Corpus Christi Cambridge, Visiting Professor King’s College London

Richard Gillis KC

Barrister specialising in commercial litigation involving company or insolvency law issues, professional negligence or civil fraud. He took Silk in 2006. In recent years, he has been heavily involved in a number of large-scale disputes concerning the acquisition of former state-owned assets in Russia, other CIS countries (including Tajikistan and Kazakhstan) and Romania. For example, he acted for Boris Berezovsky in his high profile, long-running multi-billion dollar claim against Roman Abramovich regarding Sibneft and Rusal. His other recent work includes: acting for the liquidator of Glitnir Bank and for creditors of Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander following the near collapse of the Icelandic banking system; acting for the liquidators of Enron, advising on set-off and transactions at an undervalue; acting for Part 20 defendants in an alleged fraud arising out of the operation of an aluminium smelter in Tajikistan; acting for joint venturers in a Russian oil and gas investment; acting for the claimant in an LCIA arbitration in a joint venture dispute concerning a Nigerian Oil field; acting for the directors of a collapsed Cayman hedge fund; acting for the claimants in proceedings before the European Court of First Instance claiming damages arising from the Commission’s wrongful refusal to permit a merger. As well as appearing in the Senior Courts in England and Wales, he has wide experience of litigating before many other tribunals having appeared in the European Court of First Instance, the Courts of Gibraltar, Cayman and the Isle of Man, and LCIA and Stockholm Chamber of Commerce Arbitration.

Simon Gilson has a broad commercial practice encompassing banking and finance, civil fraud, energy and natural resources, general commercial disputes and advice, group litigation, injunctions/interim relief, international arbitration, jurisdiction/choice of law, professional liability and restitution. Current and recent instructions include acting: for Nissan Motor Corporation in the ongoing industry-wide NOx emissions group litigation; for a Dutch housing association in €150m restitution claims against Nomura concerning the validity of complex interest rate derivatives; for BNY in a Commercial Court corporate trustee claim; for 58 institutional investors in the Tesco Profit Overstatement Group Litigation, the first claims under s.90A FSMA for fraudulent financial reporting by a public company; for retail investors in a large financial services group action arising from the Woodford investment fund scandal; for HSBC in a two-part Privy Council appeal from the dismissal of US$2bn professional negligence claims arising out of the Madoff securities fraud; for an energy company defending High Court fraud and conspiracy allegations; for a private equity firm in a professional negligence claim against a City law firm (LCIA arbitration); for the applicants for a US$4bn freezing injunction relating to the Ablyazov affair; for a global chemical company defending Commercial Court claims relating to European Commission findings of anti-competitive conduct; for the liquidators of a European manufacturing group in claims against its former directors.

Orlando Gledhill KC

A broad range of commercial litigation, arbitration and advice. Recently acted for Legal and General in £370 million claim for breach of exclusivity agreement and breach of confidence, Bonhams auction house in £70 million claim for conspiracy and deliberate breach of fiduciary duty, NCR Corporation in £35 million conspiracy and fraud claim, Google in a claim for breach of confidence, Alstom in public policy defence to enforcement of arbitration award, Barclays Bank in alleged breach of Quincecare duty not to follow payment instructions and in separate US$800 million claims for breach of confidence and LIBOR misrepresentation by investment funds, Goldman Sachs International in US$1.2 billion trial of claims by Libyan Investment Authority to set aside equity derivatives transactions, Liquidators in claims against RBS and Mercuria for dishonest assistance arising out of carbon trading, British Gas in trial of dispute arising from carbon emissions reductions, real estate investment fund established by Deutsche Bank, Spanish oil major in arbitration against exploration joint venture.

Barrister and arbitrator specialising in all forms of commercial dispute, including disputes relating to banking and banking regulation, commodities, competition, insurance and reinsurance and insurance regulation, investment treaty disputes, oil, gas and energy contracts and regulation, professional negligence, securities, share sale agreements, tax and telecommunications. Experienced in LCIA, ICC, SCC, SIAC, ICSID and Bermuda Form arbitrations, and regularly sitting in arbitrations with a foreign seat.

Dame Elizabeth Gloster

International commercial arbitrator, 2018 – date; acting as presiding and co-arbitrator in a wide range of international arbitrations, including: insurance/reinsurance, banking, oil and gas, energy, telecoms, shipping, construction, mining and infrastructure, joint venture, financial services, investment and investment treaty disputes; provider of expert legal advisory services in English law.

Hannah specialises in commercial disputes, with a particular emphasis on banking and finance, and civil fraud. She is instructed regularly as a junior in high-value and complex litigation and arbitration, often with an international element. She also acts as sole counsel in a wide range of disputes in the Commercial Court and Chancery Division, and has successfully appeared in the Court of Appeal. Since coming to the Bar, Hannah has appeared in several of the most important cases before the English courts, including Arcadia v MasterCard and the RBS Rights Issue Litigation (which were listed amongst The Lawyer’s Top 20 Cases of 2016 and 2017, respectively).

Tim’s broad commercial practice sees him instructed in many of the most complex, high-value disputes before the English courts and in international arbitration. Tim has particular experience in technology, banking and finance, and M&A litigation and arbitration. Current and recent matters include representing Dr Craig Wright in the high-profile “Satoshi Nakamoto” Bitcoin litigation; defending TSB in the landmark Whistletree mortgage claims; acting for Deutsche Bank in the long-running Lehman “Waterfall” proceedings; acting for Motorola Airwave in litigation concerning the UK’s emergency-communications network; and appearing for the sellers in Travelport v WEX, the precedent-setting MAE dispute arising from the aborted sale of an online travel-payments business during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Jamie Goldsmith KC

Jamie’s practice covers the full range of domestic and international commercial litigation, including jurisdiction issues, freezing injunctions, civil fraud, banking, contractual disputes, joint ventures and fiduciary duties. For the last few years, Jamie has been acting for the Danish tax authority in the SKAT litigation, in its £1.5 billion claim against a very large number of Defendants for deceit, conspiracy, dishonest assistance, knowing receipt, and restitution. This has involved successful outings in the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court and a 1 year trial due to end in April 2025. Jamie has conducted extensive advocacy and cross-examination of factual and expert witnesses in the course of the proceedings, as well as in hearings and trials in earlier proceedings for other clients. Jamie also has experience of litigating in offshore jurisdictions, (ie., Isle of Man, Anguilla, Supreme Court of the Eastern Caribbean) and Privy Council procedure. He has been admitted as a member of the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands and the Isle of Man bar. Jamie is the founder of Pro Bono Connect (www.probonoconnect.co.uk), co-founder of Pro Bono Expert Support (https://www.nationalprobonocentre.org.uk/project/pro-bono-expert-support/) and a trustee of LawWorks.

Anthony Grabiner

A commercial lawyer with a substantial court and advisory practice dealing with the major commercial issues of the day; has been instructed in most of the major commercial litigation of recent years; highly experienced as an advocate and arbitrator in domestic and international arbitrations; areas of practice include but are not limited to arbitration; banking; commodity disputes; conflict of laws; financial services; insurance; judicial review; monopolies and mergers; oil and gas cases; professional negligence; takeovers.

Charles Graham KC

Charles is a hugely experienced advocate and adviser in litigation and arbitration, with particular expertise in handling large-scale international arbitration concerning issues of contractual interpretation, energy disputes, construction projects, sale of goods, share purchase agreements, and breach of warranty claims. He has a wide experience of accounting issues, civil fraud and banking claims and many other aspects of commercial law. Recent cases include: SKAT (Skatteforvaltningen – the Danish Tax Authority) v Solo Capital Partners & ors [2023] EWHC 590 (Comm), [2023] EWHC 1413 (Comm), [2024] EWHC 19 (Comm) - Instructed by Pinsent Masons, Charles is acting for SKAT (the Danish Tax Authority) in relation to a set of consolidated claims in the Commercial Court in which SKAT is seeking the equivalent of approx £1.5 billion against over 100 defendants (including hedge funds, custodians and individuals based in England and Dubai) arising out of a fraud and a conspiracy or conspiracies that led to SKAT paying out sums to persons who were not entitled to them. Charles has acted as one of the lead silks leading a team comprising other silks and multiple juniors. He acted as lead advocate (and cross-examined two Danish tax law experts) at the trial of one of the preliminary issues ordered in the case (see [2023] EWHC 590 (Comm)) and in relation to multiple interim & case management applications (see [2023] EWHC 1413 (Comm), [2024] EWHC 19 (Comm)). Charles also conducted a substantial amount of oral advocacy and cross-examination of multiple factual witnesses at the main trial which lasted 1 year (from April 2024 to April 2025) SKAT (Skatteforvaltningen – the Danish Tax Authority) v MCML Ltd [2024] EWHC 148 (Comm); [2024] EWCA Civ 371 Instructed by Pinsent Masons, Charles is acting for SKAT, the Danish tax authority, in relation to a second and separate claim brought by SKAT against ED&F Man (which subsequently changed its name to MCML Ltd) and in particular in relation to ED&F Man’s application to strike out that second claim on the grounds of (1) issue estoppel; and (2) abuse of process (Henderson v Henderson). ED&F Man's application based on abuse of process was rejected by Bright J and the Court of Appeal. The application based on issue estoppel was rejected by Bright J but an appeal against that order was allowed by the Court of Appeal. The Supreme Court has given SKAT permission to appeal against that part of the decision of the Court of Appeal."

Alexander Gunning KC

Barrister specialising in complex, high-value international disputes, predominantly resolved in arbitration, commonly concerning large energy and offshore construction projects and the extraction and sale of natural resources.

Robert has a broad practice covering all areas of commercial disputes’ work at One Essex Court, in both litigation and arbitration.

Patrick specialises in company law, insolvency, commercial fraud and arbitrations involving corporate law issues. Patrick regularly acts on substantial shareholder disputes and restructurings with recent cases including the Petropavlovsk plc, a board dispute relating to the $1.4bn UK listed Russian gold mining company, the Tonstate Group litigation, relating to the owner of £500m hotels, and the Arcadia (Topshop/Topman) and Regis (Supercuts) CVAs. Patrick has been involved in some of the largest civil fraud claims in recent years including the $2 billion LIA v Societe Generale litigation, involving allegations of bribery and undue influence and the JSC Mezhdunarodniy Promyshelnniy Bank v Pugachev litigation on applications for £1.17 billion freezing orders, search orders, passport orders and committal applications. Patrick’s cases often involve an international element and applications for pre-emptive and interlocutory relief including freezing orders, Norwich Pharmacal orders and other interim injunctions. Patrick also has particular experience of corporate law issues arising in arbitrations, including on s. 9 stay applications and s. 69 appeals, having acted for BAE Systems plc in its long running dispute with companies owned by Andrew Ruhan. Patrick regularly appears both as a sole advocate and with a leader.

Emma Himsworth KC

Emma Himsworth specialises in all areas of intellectual property law and related aspects of competition and commercial law. Her practice encompasses both court and advisory work. She has a particular interest and expertise in matters involving trade marks and passing off. Emma sits as an Appointed Person, hearing appeals from the UK Registrar of Trade Marks. She also accepts appointments as Arbitrator. She is the current Chair of the Intellectual Property Bar Association.

Lauren Hitchman

Lauren welcomes instructions across the full spectrum of commercial disputes. In addition to her commercial work, Lauren acts in employment and public law matters, and has a particular interest in cases that sit at the intersection of these areas. Lauren is ranked as a “Rising Star” in employment law in the Legal 500, where she is described as “a bright, articulate, and extremely capable junior, with a razor-sharp forensic mind”. Lauren is a member of the Attorney General's C Panel of Counsel. Lauren is a former Visiting Lecturer in Contract Law at City, University of London. She was awarded the Inner Temple’s Princess Royal Scholarship (the Inn’s top award) for the law conversion, as well as scholarships from COMBAR and City Law School. For the Bar course, Lauren was awarded a Major Scholarship by the Inner Temple and a further scholarship from City Law School. Lauren subsequently won the Jarman Prize for ranking 1st out of 72 pupils in the Inner Temple Pupils’ Advocacy Prize 2021.

Geoffrey Hobbs KC

Barrister specialising in intellectual property law and related aspects of competition law including authors’ rights, breach of confidence, broadcasting, computer software agreements, copyright, covenants not to compete, designs, employees’ inventions, European and UK competition (as affecting the enforcement/exploitation of intellectual property rights and agreements), medicines’ licensing under European directives and UK law, misleading advertising, passing off and unfair competition, patent and know-how licences, patents, performers’ rights, publishing and recording agreements, restraint of trade, service marks, songwriters and entertainers contracts, technical assistance agreements, trade marks, trade secrets; a synopsis of notable cases in which he has been involved is available on request.

Guy Hollingworth

Guy Hollingworth specialises in intellectual property law with particular experience in matters concerning trade marks and passing off. His practice encompasses both contentious and non-contentious work and he regularly appears in the High Court, Court of Appeal, the UK IPO and has twice appeared in the Supreme Court. Guy is also a CEDR accredited mediator.

Henry Hoskins’ practice covers a wide spectrum of commercial dispute resolution, including litigation and international arbitration. Henry has acted in complex, high-value litigation in the High Court and the Court of Appeal led by senior members of Chambers, as well as regularly appearing as sole counsel in the High Court (including the Commercial Court, the Chancery Division, and the Queen's Bench Division). He also has experience of international arbitration, including under the LCIA, ICC and Swiss Rules, and of arbitration issues in the Commercial Court. He has published a number of commentaries concerning commercial law in the Journal of International Banking and Financial Law and the Law Quarterly Review.

Sa'ad Hossain KC

Barrister practising in all areas of commercial dispute resolution (litigation and arbitration) with particular expertise in energy and natural resources; banking and financial services; shareholder disputes; civil fraud; freezing orders and jurisdictional disputes; and professional negligence. Recent matters include: MAC/MAE disputes in M&A acquisitions arising from COVID-19 travel disruption (Travelport v WEX); fraud and conspiracy claims in relation to sports licensing (SDIR v Rangers) and more generally (Hungry Panda); upstream production sharing disputes and downstream gas pricing disputes (North Sea and continental Europe); place of damage/branch agency jurisdictional disputes in international banking disputes (Kwok v UBS); and multiple pre-emption/tag-along/drag-along shareholder disputes.

Jarret has a broad commercial practice across Chambers’ profile, including banking and finance, commercial litigation, civil fraud, energy and mining, and arbitration. Having practised for several years in Singapore prior to coming to the English Bar, he has experience of litigation before the English, Singaporean, and Malaysian Courts at all levels, as well as of major ICC, LCIA, SIAC, and HKIAC arbitrations. Jarret has been involved in a number of high-profile cases, including four of The Lawyer’s “Top 20 Cases”. Jarret’s work covers all of Chambers’ core practice areas. Examples of notable cases include: The Public Institution for Social Security (“PIFSS”) v Al-Rajaan: Claims against c.45 defendants worth around US$900 million arising out of the alleged payment of secret commissions, bribery, and money-laundering. One of The Lawyer’s “Top 20” cases of 2025. Instructed on behalf of Union Bancaire Privée (a Swiss private bank) and members of the de Picciotto family with Tom Adam KC, Douglas Paine, and Rob Harris. Barry Maloney v Falcon VII Investments Sarl: Dispute over shareholder rights and exit provisions in the contractual arrangements underpinning a private equity fund’s investment in a tech “unicorn” valued at around US$2 billion. One of The Lawyer’s “Top 20” cases of 2025. Instructed on behalf of the defendant private equity fund with Lord (David) Wolfson KC and Joyce Arnold. Municipio de Mariana v BHP Group: The largest ever group litigation brought in the English Courts, concerning the collapse of the Fundao tailings dam at the Samarco Mariana Mining Complex in Brazil. The claims are valued at c. £33 billion and involve around 600,000 individual claimants. One of The Lawyer’s “Top 20” cases of 2024. Assisting, among others, Dan Toledano KC and Nick Sloboda KC, for BHP (during pupillage). Crypto Open Patent Alliance (“COPA”) v Wright: Dispute over the identity of “Satoshi Nakamoto”, the inventor of Bitcoin, with follow-on claims worth several billion pounds. The proceedings involved extensive expert evidence on cryptocurrencies and forensic technology, as well as allegations of fraud and the falsification of evidence. One of The Lawyer’s “Top 20” cases of 2024. Assisted, among others, Lord Grabiner KC and Craig Orr KC, for Dr Wright (during pupillage). Set-aside Proceedings arising out of Suppipat v Narondej: Proceedings before Singapore’s apex court to set aside a US$700 million ICC award arising in connection with a long-running and multi-jurisdictional dispute between two UHNWIs over wind farm investments. Suppipat v Narongdej was one of The Lawyer’s “Top 20” cases of 2022. Siccar Point (Cayman) Holdco I Limited v Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited: Claims arising out of the sale and purchase of a corporate group engaged in North Sea exploration, development, and production. The claim arises out of the Supreme Court’s decision in ex parte Finch, and is the first case considering Finch’s effects on existing contingent consideration arrangements. Instructed on behalf of Ithaca with Laurence Rabinowitz KC and Laurence Emmett KC. In addition to acting in commercial disputes, Jarret also advises (including as sole counsel) on a broad range of contexts. These have included “de-banking” arising out of economic sanctions, litigation funding arrangements in a significant piece of English group litigation, and a potential investor-state dispute concerning a Southeast Asian state and a major African diamond mining entity. Jarret has a particular interest in cases concerning civil fraud, restitution, and shareholder disputes, having previously taught and published in these fields. Between 2020-2022, Jarret taught at the Singapore Management University (including as Course Convenor for Company Law). In the 2022-2023 Academic Year, Jarret lectured at Trinity College and The Queen’s College at Oxford University. Jarret’s publications have been cited with approval by leading academics and in judgments by the High Court of Singapore.

A general commercial specialist with extensive experience of complex and high value commercial litigation and arbitration. Daniel is experienced on matters involving arbitration, energy, civil fraud, company law and complex contractual disputes, as well as his expertise in freezing injunctions. Daniel is equally comfortable on his own, including appearing as sole counsel on matters such as Re: Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (Ch) – acting for Paragon Capital Management Fund Ltd, one of the respondents to an application by the Administrators of Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (LBIE), in a 12-day hearing to determine how certain of LBIE's assets should be distributed in accordance with FSA rules; or being led on matters such as Venture North Sea Gas Ltd v Nuon Exploration & Production UK Ltd (Comm) – acting for the claimant in a claim for specific performance and obligation to complete under a SPA concerning interests in certain gas fields and exploration blocks in the North Sea. Since 2013 Daniel has been heavily engaged in two major multi-billion dollar LCIA arbitrations, each centered upon the oil and gas industry, led by Gordon Pollock QC, concerning breach of confidentiality agreements in relation to petroleum concessions and long term contracts for the exploitation of petroleum. As well as trials, Daniel is frequently instructed to act in applications including worldwide freezing injunctions, summary judgments, security for costs and the delivery up of confidential information.

Sebastian Isaac KC

Sebastian is a leading practitioner specialising in complex and high value commercial disputes, in both litigation and international arbitration. Seb is particularly noted for his user friendly and commercially minded approach, and for his command of the courtroom as a cross-examiner and oral advocate. Recent example cases include: acting for Credit Suisse Life in the Bermuda Court of Appeal defending claims by the Georgian billionaire Bidzina Ivanishvili; representing the defendants in the high value fraud claim between Otkritie Bank and the owners of the O1 Property Group; appearing in ICC arbitration for a Dutch infrastructure investment company in a dispute with its joint venture partner in a deep water grain terminal on the Russian Black Sea coast; acting for the shareholders of the failed Real Estate Investment Trust, Home REIT; and representing an online NFT auction house in a dispute with a high-value bidder. Seb also represented the Ukrainian billionaire Victor Pinchuk in his very high value LCIA Arbitration and High Court claims against Igor Kolomoisky and Gennadiy Bogolyubov, both of which were pursued successfully to settlement during and just before the final hearings. Main areas of practice include energy, commodities, banking and finance, civil fraud, and professional negligence.

Joe is building a broad commercial practice across all areas of Chambers’ work. His practice covers the full range of commercial litigation, arbitration and advisory work. He is comfortable working in counsel teams of various sizes or alone.

Barrister specialising in commercial litigation.

Barrister practising across a broad range of commercial litigation.

Hannah Brown KC

Barrister with a broad commercial practice specialising in arbitration, aviation, finance, banking, civil fraud, insurance and reinsurance, oil disputes, and professional negligence.

Neil Kitchener KC

Commercial barrister instructed in many of the heaviest and most complex cases of the day. Recent and ongoing cases include the Tesco fraud litigation (investor claims resulting from the publication of fraudulent accounts), Halliburton v Chubb (arbitrator bias), Nissan v Ghosn (fraud claim against the former president of Nissan). A particular emphasis on international fraud and asset tracing, financial services, shareholder and company disputes and arbitration. Frequently appears in Courts and tribunals overseas, including BVI, Cayman, Singapore.

Michael has a broad practice spanning international arbitration (both commercial and investor-state) and commercial litigation. He is regularly instructed in high-value, complex disputes, often including a foreign law or public international law element. He is equally comfortable working on cases of lesser value, whether led or unled. Michael’s current/recent matters include: Municipio de Mariana v BHP Group (UK) Ltd – acting for BHP Group (UK) Ltd and BHP Group Limited in the US$ multi-billion group litigation arising from the Fundão dam collapse in Brazil (with a team including Daniel Toledano KC and Nicholas Sloboda KC) Goh Chin Soon v People’s Republic of China - defending the People’s Republic of China (led by Michael Sullivan KC) in investor-state arbitration proceedings before the Permanent Court of Arbitration in an expropriation claim relating to land said to be worth in excess of US$1.5 billion Rolls-Royce Holdings plc v Goodrich Corporation – acting for various Rolls Royce entities (with Daniel Toledano KC and David Caplan) in Commercial Court proceedings against Goodrich Corporation relating to the exercise of a call option and allegations of breaches of exclusivity rights Acting in arbitration proceedings (LCIA Rules) in a dispute following the termination of a contract relating to the construction of a processing facility in Russia Advising an ultra-high net-worth individual (including in proceedings in Jersey) in relation to a family dispute involving the wrongful transfer of assets and mismanagement of various offshore entities (led by John McCaughran KC and Laurence Emmett KC) Michael has been listed as a Future Leader in International Arbitration by Who’s Who Legal (now Lexology Index) since 2018 and in 2025 was listed as “Most Highly Regarded” within that category.

KV Krishnaprasad

Krishna’s practice covers all areas of commercial dispute resolution focussing in particular on large-scale disputes involving complex points of law. Krishna recently appeared in the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeal (led by Lord Pannick KC) in successful appeals on behalf of the Danish Tax and Customs Administration (The Lawyer’s Top 10 Appeals of 2022). He acts at first instance (led by Laurence Rabinowitz KC and Charles Graham KC) in the year-long trial of a £1.5 billion fraud claim in proceedings which have been described as “perhaps the largest and most complicated civil proceedings ever commenced in the Commercial Court” (The Lawyer’s Top 20 Cases of 2021). Krishna’s other recent instructions include a two-day hearing before the Court of Appeal raising complex legal issues relating to issue estoppel and abuse of process (led by Charles Graham KC), an appeal testing the application of the reflective loss rule to civil fraud claims (led by Stephen Auld KC), a four-day appeal raising issues relating to remoteness and ‘loss of a chance’ damages (led by David Edwards KC and Orlando Gledhill KC; the appeal settled after exchange of skeleton arguments), a four-week Commercial Court trial defending a c.£350 million claim (led by Orlando Gledhill KC) and the independent investigation into the FCA’s regulation of London Capital & Finance (led by Dame Elizabeth Gloster DBE). From March to July 2019, Krishna worked as a Judicial Assistant at the Commercial Court where he assisted the judges with some of the leading cases decided during that period including Arcelormittal v Essar Steel [2019] EWHC 724 (Comm) (Jacobs J), PJSC Tatneft v Bogolyubov [2019] EWHC 1400 (Comm) (Butcher J), Saab v Dangate Consulting Ltd [2019] EWHC 1558 (Comm) (Cockerill J), Ministry Of Defence v International Military Services Ltd [2019] EWHC 1994 (Comm) (Phillips J) and Magdeev v Tsvetkov [2019] EWHC 1557 (Comm) (Picken J). Before Krishna was called to the Bar, he researched and taught the law of restitution at Oxford. His work on the subject was cited with approval by Leggatt LJ (as he then was) in Equitas Insurance Ltd v Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 718. His book ‘Unjust Enrichment and Countervailing Obligations’ (Hart 2025) is due to be published in early 2025. He is also an editor of and contributor to ‘Foundations of Indian Contract Law’ (OUP 2024). Krishna is qualified to practice in India and is able to advise on commercial disputes involving Indian law.

Peter Leaver KC

Highly experienced international commercial arbitrator. Peter Leaver has acted as sole arbitrator, a member of the arbitral tribunal and chairman, in numerous arbitrations, often under ICC, LCIA, SIAC, HKIAC and UNCITRAL Rules. Recent examples of cases include a dispute concerning the licensing of patents; a dispute arising out of a joint venture for exploitation of shale gas; a dispute concerning a negligence claim in the spacecraft and telecommunications industry; a dispute involving the intellectual property rights of partners in a joint venture; a dispute concerning modernistaion of the Russian Federation gas system; a dispute concerning the supply of defective and non-confirming products (batteries), in breach of two supply agreements; a dispute concerning a share of purchase agreement regarding the issued share of capital of a company providing courier delivery services in Russia and Kyrgyzstan; and a dispute concerning the finalisation of a binding worldwide license agreement under the Licensed Patents on FRAND terms and conditions.

Saul Lemer undertakes a broad range of commercial disputes including both litigation and arbitration. Saul has been involved in a number of high value led cases but also enjoys the advocacy opportunities afforded by his un-led work. In litigation, Saul currently acts (with Daniel Toledano QC) for Diageo in c US$140 million Commercial Court proceedings against Vijay Mallya and others and (with Craig Orr QC) in c €100 million Commercial Court proceedings relating to the sale of a Bulgarian telecommunications business. In arbitration, Saul has recently been involved (also with Daniel Toledano QC), in LCIA proceedings for the claimant bringing a multi-million dollar claim for breach of an SPA. Other notable cases have included: Tsareva v Ananyev; Galagaev v Ananyev [2018] (Comm) – Saul acts for the First Defendant in relation to a c US$100 million claim for alleged fraudulent misrepresentation in connection with the sale of Loan Notes in Russia. Diageo v Mallya [2018] (Comm) – Saul acts for Diageo in a c US$150 million claim against Vijay Mallya and connected parties. LICT v VTBC [2016] EWHC 1891 (Comm); [2018] EWHC 169 (Comm) – Saul acts for the Second and Fourth Defendants in a c €100 million claim relating to the enforcement of a pledge over shares in a Bulgarian telecommunications business. European Real Estate Debt Fund (Cayman) Ltd v Treon [2018] (Comm) – Saul acts for the Second and Third Defendant against whom the Claimant seeks c £15 million for alleged fraudulent misrepresentations in connection with the sale of certain Loan Notes. Romanello Financial Corp v Lars Windhorst [2017] (Comm) – Saul acted (both as sole counsel and led) for the claimants seeking to recover c €60 million invested in shares and bonds on terms that the shares and bonds would be repurchased on a specific date. Chesterfield United Inc v Deutsche Bank AG [2016] (Ch) – Saul acted for Deutsche Bank in c. €500 million litigation arising out of the sale of credit linked notes. Greenclose Ltd v National Westminster Bank Plc [2014] EWHC 1156 (Ch) – Saul acted in a claim relating to the notice provisions under contract governed by an ISDA Master Agreement. Avrahami v Biran & Ors [2013] EWHC 1776 (Ch) – Saul acted (as sole counsel) for the defendant in a claim relating to fraudulent misrepresentation, breaches of fiduciary duty and damages (Saul cross-examined 19 claimant witnesses). Fidelity Bank PLC v Constant Capital Markets & Securities Ltd [2012] (Comm) – Saul acted for the claimant in a claim relating to the rectification of Repo Agreements in relation to US$ 80m worth of Nigerian Government Bonds. JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov [2011] EWHC 2506 (Comm) – Saul acted for a number of defendants in a claim relating to banking fraud and, in particular in relation to an application for relief from sanctions.

Andrew Lenon KC

Barrister specialising in commercial litigation and arbitration. Andrew also acts as an arbitrator and mediator.

Ben’s practice covers complex and high-value commercial, competition and public law litigation. He is frequently instructed in High Court and CAT proceedings, both as sole counsel and as part of a team. He currently appears in many of the largest cases going through the English courts.

Ruihan has a broad practice across Chambers’ profile, including commercial litigation, banking and finance, energy and arbitration. Before transferring to the Bar, she practised as a solicitor at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP in London, where she worked on business and human rights-related group actions in the English Court, and LCIA and ICC arbitrations. She has appeared as sole counsel in the High Court and County Court. Her recent work includes: Acting in an LCIA arbitration concerning a USD 100 million contractual claim arising out of the LNG supply chain of a South Asian country Acting in a USD 136 million Commercial Court claim arising from an M&A transaction Acting in a Commercial Court dispute concerning equity derivatives and Russia-related sanctions Advising on shareholder and contempt proceedings before the BVI courts

Barrister specialising in commercial litigation, including contractual disputes, unjust enrichment and restitution, fraud, companies and trusts and banking and financial services.

Andrew has a broad commercial practice that spans investor-state disputes, commercial arbitrations, complex multi-jurisdictional litigation, and all aspects of intellectual property law. He has acted in a range of cases in the London High Court as well as in arbitrations under all the main institutional rules (LCIA, ICC, HKIAC, etc). With a doctorate in chemistry, Andrew is comfortable with highly technical subject matter, and has particular experience acting in pharmaceutical, IT, and construction disputes.A list of Andrew's recent cases can be found at https://www.oeclaw.co.uk/barristers/full-cv/andrew-lomas

James MacDonald KC

James is a leading commercial silk practising in all aspects of commercial law. Particularly well-known for his high-profile general commercial and banking and finance practice, James’s practice encompasses all major areas of commercial law, including fraud, technology, energy, aviation, professional negligence, injunctions, jurisdiction, enforcement and international arbitration (under ICC, ICSID and LCIA rules). James is has been ranked in the leading directories for commercial law and banking and finance for many years and regularly appears in the largest and most valuable Commercial Court cases (current or recent cases include Mozambique ‘tuna bonds’, ENRC v Dechert; PIFSS v Pictet; Vestia v DB; Tchenguiz v Grant Thornton; DB v Sebastian, Vik).

Kenneth Maclean KC

Barrister specialising in commercial, company and banking litigation including a wide variety of offshore litigation with advocacy experience at trial and appellate level in England and Wales and offshore jurisdictions. Recent cases include acting for the successful Third Defendant in Tatneft v Bogolyubov and others [2021] EWHC 411 Comm, successfully defending a case of alleged front-running and fraud against HSBC Bank in ECU Group plc v HSBC Bank plc [2021] EWHC 2875 (Comm) successfully challenging jurisdiction of the English courts on behalf of the Third, Eighth and Tenth Respondents in a case brought by the Kuwaiti Public Institution for Social Security against, amongst others, a number of Swiss financial institutions [2022] EWCA Civ 29, and representing the administrators of Phones 4u in a standalone damages claim against major mobile phone networks.

Barrister specialising in commercial work.

John McCaughran KC

John McCaughran’s practice covers a broad spectrum of commercial litigation and arbitration, with an emphasis on energy/oil and gas cases.

Andrew’s broad practice spans commercial and commercial chancery litigation, arbitration and advisory work. He has extensive experience of high-value and complex business disputes, with an emphasis on banking/financial services work, heavy contractual claims, civil fraud and company/insolvency matters. He maintains a specialist interest in trusts and other traditional Chancery areas and is a contributor to Snell’s Equity. Applications for freezing injunctions, Norwich Pharmacal orders, anti-suit injunctions and other interim relief form a mainstay of his practice, both before the English courts and in leading offshore jurisdictions. Current and recent cases include: Convoy Collateral v Broad Idea [2022] 2 WLR 703 (Privy Council); Rowland v Stanford [2022] EWHC 2135 (Ch), [2022] EWHC 1713 (Ch), [2022] EWHC 1436 (Ch), [2021] EWHC 1682 (Ch), [2021] EWHC 988 (Ch), [2021] EWHC 252 (Ch); Palmali Shipping v Litasco [2021] EWHC 1161 (Comm); Kea Investments v Watson [2022] 4 WLR 14, [2020] EWHC 2796 (Ch), [2020] EWHC 2599 (Ch); Evison v Finvision [2019] EWHC 3057 (Comm); Renova v Emmerson (Privy Council, Eastern Caribbean Court of Appeal, Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court); for professional trustees in a multi-party claim concerning a c.£65m trust for the successful respondent in a c.£150 million LCIA arbitration arising under a price review clause.

Michelle Menashy KC

Specialising in international arbitration and jurisdiction disputes, having acted in a number of leading cases including Cecil and others v Bayat and others [2011] EWCA Civ 523, Michelle’s practice covers the broad range of international and domestic litigation in all of chambers’ key areas including banking and finance and energy. Frequently instructed (with and without a leader) in high profile and high value cases, Michelle’s recent work includes three sets of parallel proceedings (ICC and UNCITRAL) concerning substantial £150m+ disputes relating to force majeure defences to the lack of gas supply to chemical plants; expedited section 994 unfair prejudice petition proceedings arising out of the disputed sale of a 25% shareholding in an international software business; a €120million dispute concerning a major gas pipeline running under the Black Sea; a $4billion telecoms shareholder dispute; and sole counsel in a dispute concerning the acquisition of a portfolio of non-performing loans for in excess of £1billion. She also has significant experience of appearing and advising on a broad range of applications including service out of the jurisdiction, security for costs, Norwich Pharmacal orders, anti-suit injunctions and summary judgments.

Richard has a broad commercial litigation and arbitration practice, including civil fraud, banking, energy, financial services / regulatory and general commercial disputes. He also has significant experience of seeking and resisting injunctive relief, and of jurisdiction challenges. Richard is currently acting, amongst other cases: as lead advocate (leading William Harman) for the claimants in a substantial (over £100m) high-profile shareholder class action against Boohoo Plc; and with Andrew Onslow KC (and leading two juniors) for the Stewarts Claimants in the substantial Glencore shareholder class actions. Richard has recently acted: with Camilla Bingham KC, in heavy Commercial Court and ICC arbitration proceedings in relation to a valuable stake in a Mexican online gambling company; with Camilla Bingham KC and James MacDonald KC for Morgan Stanley in Frasers v Morgan Stanley, resisting a substantial high-profile claim (4 week trial); with Anna Boase KC in Mahtani v Atlas Mara, successfully resisting claims of over $100m arising out of a Zambian bank’s sale (4 week trial; [2024] EWHC 218 (Comm)); in the Court of Appeal (leading Harry Stratton) for the successful appellants in Gorbachev v Guriev [2023] 1 WLR 2457; with Lord Wolfson KC, defending a fraud claim of $280m and challenging jurisdiction; and for the Financial Conduct Authority, in three confidential Enforcement cases involving dishonesty and lack of integrity.

James has a broad practice which covers the whole range of commercial disputes, including (for example) disputes concerning debt or equity finance, telecoms, and utilities. James also has a particular interest in disputes concerning art; he is a board member (and chair of the legal committee) of DACS (a not-for-profit organisation which protects the rights of visual artists). Approximately half of James’ practice is court litigation, in England and overseas. James is admitted as a member of the Bar of the British Virgin Islands, and has considerable experience of litigation in the Privy Council. He also has extensive experience of group litigation (both under formal GLOs and otherwise). The other half of James’ practice is international commercial arbitration. James has extensive experience of arbitration under various institutional rules (including ICC, LCIA and UNCITRAL), and of litigation concerning the enforcement of arbitral awards. Current and recent cases include: (1) Magomedov v TPG ($10bn+ claim arising out of an alleged conspiracy with the Russian state to seize valuable ports in Russia); (2) Surrey Searches v Northumbrian Water (group litigation by property search companies seeking restitution of fees paid for environmental information) [2024] EWHC 1643 (Ch); (3) RF Corval v REINO Capital (claim arising out of investment in a real estate fund).

Sabrina Nanchahal

Sabrina has a broad practice covering all areas of Chambers’ work. She has worked on a range of commercial disputes including in arbitration, civil fraud, energy and commercial litigation.

Called to the Bar and practised largely in property law, taking silk in 1987. Practice involved a large amount of court and arbitration advocacy, as well as much advisory work. Appointed a High Court Judge, sitting in the Chancery Division, in 1996, and tried a number of cases involving financial and commercial contractual disputes, revenue law, company law, insolvency law, IP law, and property law, professional negligence. Since joining One Essex Court in 2017 as a full-time arbitrator, has been appointed as Chairman, Party-Appointed Arbitrator and Sole Arbitrator in a number of arbitrations under different rules, including ICC, LCIA, SIAC, UNCITRAL and WIPO. These appointments have covered a wide range of practice areas including building, trade mark, patent, insurance, investor-state, property valuation, breach of trust, oil and gas, mining, employment, business sale, and inter-investor disputes.

Alaina specialises in intellectual property. She has been involved in a number of complex cases working as part of a team in the CAT, High Court and Court of Appeal, as well as advising and appearing in cases as sole counsel. In addition to litigation, she also has experience of international arbitration Before coming to the bar, Alaina practised as a litigation solicitor in Australia (Blake Dawson Waldron, now Ashurst LLP) and in the UK (Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and TSol). She qualified as a barrister and solicitor in Western Australia in 2006. A few highlights of Alaina’s practice over the last two years include: Wright & Wright International Investments Limited v Payward, Inc; Payward, Ltd; and Payward Ventures, Inc: led by Philip Roberts KC and acting for the Defendants who were successful in this claim for passing off in relation to the digital asset “Bitcoin”. There were various applications made in the Claim (see [2023] EWHC 1893 (Ch) and [2023] EWHC 1894 (Ch)). The final judgment can be found at [2024] EWHC 1809. B&Q Limited v Wren Kitchens Limited: led by Emma Himsworth KC and acting for the Claimants in this claim concerning comparative advertising. Ladbrokes Betting and Gaming Limited & LC International Limited v Blockchain Game Partners, Inc & Gala Labs Limited: led by Emma Himsworth KC and acting for the Claimants in this claim concerning trade mark infringement. Easygroup Ltd v Premier Inn Hotels Limited: led by Emma Himsworth KC and acting for the Defendants in this trade mark infringement claim. The trial of the matter was dealt with by another junior, while Alaina was on sabbatical (see [2025] EWHC 2229 (Ch)). In addition, Alaina frequently appears in the IPO. A few examples of recent IPO decisions in matters where Alaina has acted as sole Counsel include: “CERAD” Case O/0328/25: A successful appeal to the Appointed Person from the decision in the below case. “CERAD” Case O/0922/23: Opposition proceedings in the IPO concerning the rights in the mark “CERAD” “iPhone” BL/0781/24: successfully applied to strike out two cancellation actions as an abuse of process. “PetTrak” O/0793/24: Opposition proceedings in the IPO. “AFTV” O/0877/23: Opposition proceedings in the IPO concerning the rights in the mark “AFTV”. This involved cross-examination in the Registry. “TRIFOX” O/0524/23: Opposition and invalidation proceedings in the IPO. “ARIA” O/0455/23: Opposition proceedings in the IPO.

Edmund Nourse KC

Barrister specialising in commercial dispute resolution, including: arbitration, civil fraud, commercial law, shareholder disputes and group litigation. Past notable cases include acting for Sir Frederick and Sir David Barclay in shareholder dispute over ownership of Connaught, Berkeley and Claridge’s hotels; and acting for construction company defendants to group litigation action by 500 blacklisted construction workers; acting for Australian financial entrepreneur, Graham Tuckwell, in US$500m shareholder dispute in Jersey; and for several leading UK water companies in £100m claims relating to the Environmental Information Regulations.

Rachel Oakeshott

Rachel is ranked as a Leading Junior in Commercial Litigation by Chambers & Partners 2025 and Legal 500 2025, and in International Arbitration by Chambers & Partners 2025: “Rachel is a star junior. She's very easy to work with and clear and precise in her advice. Her attention to detail and work product is really impressive." Rachel’s practice covers a broad range of commercial work in litigation and international arbitration (including under LCIA, ICC and UNCITRAL rules). “Rachel is bright, hardworking and full of good ideas.” (Legal 500, Commercial Litigation 2024.) Regularly involved in large complex cases working as part of a team, she also has experience appearing without a leader in arbitrations and in the High Court. As well as experience in Chambers’ key areas including banking and financial services, civil fraud, and pharmaceutical disputes, Rachel is currently acting for a FTSE 100 company defending high profile group litigation claims. Rachel accepts appointments as an arbitrator and has been appointed as an arbitrator by the LCIA Court. She is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. Rachel’s current and recent work includes: Acting for a FTSE 100 company defending group litigation claims arising out of the suspension of the Woodford Equity Income Fund Acting with Richard Boulton KC for claimant investors in commercial real estate in Ukraine in four Bilateral Investment Treaty claims against the Russian Federation under UNCITRAL rules, resulting in a Final Award in October 2022 (PCA Case 2015-29) Acting with Neil Kitchener KC for defendants to a £25 million debt and fraud claim achieving dismissal of the claim following material non-disclosure by the Claimants on an ex parte application: [2021] EWHC 1415 (Comm) [2021] 6 WLUK 12 Acting for Credit Suisse (UK) Limited in complex fraud proceedings Acting with Anthony de Garr Robinson KC for a pharmaceutical company in its USD $2.7 billion LCIA arbitration claim against a contract manufacturing organisation Acting for a life sciences company defending ICC claims arising out of a toll manufacturing agreement concerning poppy straws Acting with Stuart Isaacs KC and David Cavender KC for the defendants in two LCIA arbitrations concerning investments of over USD $1.5 billion in Indian real estate funds Acting as sole counsel for Maze sarl, a Luxembourg provider of corporate services, defending claims under Luxembourg law arising out of the sale of Bulgaria’s largest telecommunications business Vivacom, at a five day trial of preliminary issues of Luxembourg law in the Commercial Court in December 2017: [2018] EWHC 169 (Comm) Advising Seaway Heavy Lifting Offshore Contractors BV on its contractual arrangements regarding the Beatrice Offshore Windfarm Project Acting (with Stuart Isaacs KC) for Stuart Wall against The Royal Bank of Scotland in one of The Lawyer’s Top 20 cases to watch in 2017. Mr Wall owned the Opal Property Group, once the UK’s third largest provider of student accommodation. Mr Wall claimed over £600 million in damages suffered as a result of RBS’s fraudulent misrepresentations, breaches of contract and negligence. The case concerned claims of swap mis-selling by RBS, allegations against RBS’s Global Restructuring Group, and allegations of LIBOR manipulation. The case was listed for a 12 week trial in the Commercial Court starting in October 2017, but settled shortly before trial

Jeffery Onions KC

Jeffery Onions undertakes a wide range of complex commercial and company law disputes work both as an advocate and in an advisory context. He has particular expertise in banking and finance, company and insolvency, commercial litigation, civil fraud, energy/oil and gas, insurance and reinsurance, shareholder disputes and international arbitration. He also accepts appointments as an arbitrator and expert. Recent cases include: Acting in a significant claim for fraudulent misrepresentation and breach of warranty arising from the sale a pharmaceutical business. Advising in relation to arbitration claims arising from a significant construction project in the Middle East. Acting as a party-appointed arbitrator in a Bermuda Form arbitration. Acting as sole arbitrator in a claim relating to litigation funding agreements. Acting in a number of cases involving secured finance loans raising allegations of sham, duress and undue influence. PCP/Staveley v. Barclays Bank plc. Appearing at trial for Barclays in a high profile dispute involving substantial claims arising from the alleged role of PCP and Ms Steveley in assisting Barclays to raise £7 billion a capital raising conducted by the bank during the 2008 financial crisis (one of The Lawyer's top cases of 2019 and 2020). Acting in confidential cases involving complex multi-tiered debt re-structuring, with particular reference to the effects of the covid pandemic Acting in an international arbitration (ICC) involving Chinese investments in foreign based funds involving issues of contractual construction, rectification, foreign law and fraud. Acting in a confidential dispute relating to the operation of luxury hotels and alleged breaches of management agreements relating thereto. Acting in a confidential dispute involving to the transfer and operation of substantial infrastructure assets in relation to North Sea oil and gas. Acting for the claimant in a substantial fraud claim in relation to Kazakhstan mining assets raising issues of Kazakh law, jurisdiction and proper law. Acting for excess insurers in a confidential dispute relating to costs coverage issues. Advising on issues related to the quantum of damage arising from an international arbitration relating to substantial shipbuilding contract and fraud/bribery related claims. Acting in and confidential dispute involving a major infrastructure provider in relation to issues arising with the entities using the infrastructure, dealing with contractual claims by those entities and arising out of complex scheme established for the use of the structure and advising on strategies to avoid and minimise claims. Acting in a substantial arbitration involving a dispute between private equity funds in relation to the purchase of telecom towers in Africa. Advising on contractual construction issues arising from a joint venture agreement in relation to a substantial public procurement exercise and the effect of challenges to the validity of the procurement exercise. Advising an electricity provider on claims arising from damage to the provider’s infrastructure. Notable reported cases include: Apache Beryl v Marathon Acting for a non-party heavily involved in an expedited trial in the Commercial Court relating to the proposed purchase of significant infrastructure assets in the North Sea and raising issues as to reasonable consent to transfers, pre-emption, de-commissioning costs and the reliability of financial models of future earnings from the transportation of gas. Lebara Mobile Ltd v Lycamobile UK Ltd [2015] EWHC 3318 (Ch) Acting for Lyca in successfully defending injunction proceedings alleging numerous causes of action under English and certain EC laws. Under English Lebara alleged, in particular, conspiracy to injure, interference with its business by unlawful means, unlawful means conspiracy and a direct claim under the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003. IBM v Fujitsu [2014] EWHC 752, Acting for IBM in a substantial computer contract dispute raising issues as to the construction and effect of exemption clauses. McKillen v Maybourne Finance Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 864, appearing for Maybourne Finance Ltd in a case involving the interpretation of a loan agreement and issues of novation. Included a hearing before the Court of Appeal dealing with the construction of articles of association. Tullet Prebon v BGC Brokers. Acting at first instance [2012 IRLR 648] for the Claimants in a claim alleging unlawful means conspiracy based on inducing or procuring employees to act in breach of their contracts of employment that also raised issues of sham constructive dismissal, the enforcement of garden leave injunctions and the grant of “no poach” injunctions. Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v Conarken Group Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 644; [2012] 1 All E.R. (Comm) 692. Acting for Network Rail in a test case in the Court of Appeal relating to the recoverability in tort of economic loss in the form of compensation payable pursuant to complex contractual provisions governing the relations between Network Rail and Train Operating Companies following damage and disruption to train services as a result of "bridge strikes". Centrica & BGTL v. Premier Power [2006] EWHC 3068 (Comm), [2006] All ER (D) 23 (Dec); [2007] EWHC 527 (Comm) Acting for PPL, in relation to the construction of a Gas Supply Agreement in light of Network Code changes and postalisation in Northern Ireland. Harley Street Capital Ltd v. Tchigirinsky & Ors [2005] EWHC 1897 (Ch). Successfully defending a derivative action, concerning the conduct of Russian subsidiaries. Specifically the alleged fraudulent acquisition of an oil field from Roman Abramovich's Sibir Energy plc, in the context of a minority shareholders action.

Barrister practising across the spectrum of commercial dispute resolution (both litigation and international arbitration). Areas of expertise include banking and financial services, civil fraud, energy and natural resources, professional negligence, insurance, product liability and all forms of contractual disputes (including construction and joint venture disputes). Recent work includes representing a product manufacturer in the Public Inquiry and litigation arising out of the Grenfell Tower fire; a multinational investment manager in a dispute concerning a $3 billion loan facility; a major pension fund in a dispute concerning a ground rent portfolio; a leading insurer in business interruption litigation arising out of the Covid-19 pandemic; Luxembourg liquidators in multi-jurisdictional investment fund disputes; the Libyan Investment Authority in $2.1 billion corruption claims against Societe Generale; and an AIM listed mineral resources company in proceedings to recover misappropriated mineral rights. As well as appearing in the Senior Courts in England and Wales, Craig has experience of appearing before other tribunals, including the Supreme Court of Bermuda and LCIA and UNCITRAL arbitration tribunals. He also has extensive experience of giving evidence on English law in foreign proceedings (including in Canada and Singapore).

$Sam O\'Leary$

Sam O’Leary has a broad commercial practice encompassing litigation, arbitration and advice. He has particular experience of complex financial matters; contentious corporate and shareholder litigation; energy and resources; jurisdictional disputes; and civil fraud. He has substantial trialexperience, both alone and with a leader. Significant recent cases include: SKAT v Solo Capital Partners LLP (ongoing litigation relating to massive Danish tax fraud); Tsareva v Ananyev (major multi-party jurisdictional dispute); Komoto Copper v Africa Horizons Investments (anti-suit injunction relating to mining contractual dispute); Re Edwardian Group Limited (shareholder action relating to the management and ownership of a £1bn hotel business); The RBS Rights Issue Litigation (acting for RBS in £4bn claim under s 90 FSMA); Dana Gas PJSC v Dana Gas Sukuk Ltd (validity of a $850m Islamic Finance structure); Re Charterhouse Capital Limited (six-week trial and subsequent appeal relating to the management buy-out of a leading private equity house).

Barrister practising in commercial litigation and arbitration, including banking and financial services, civil fraud, energy and general commercial disputes. Recent cases include British Gas Trading Ltd v (1) Shell UK Ltd (2) Esso Exploration & Production UK Ltd [2020] EWCA Civ 2349 and [2018] EWHC 3943 (Comm) (alleged breaches of a long-term gas sales agreement), PIFSS v Al Rajaan (alleged fraud involving the Kuwait pension fund), and a high-value arbitration concerning an infrastructure project in CIS.

Conall Patton KC has a broad commercial practice, including energy, competition, banking and finance, jurisdiction/choice of law, civil fraud and international arbitration. He is highly rated for his oral advocacy and cross-examination skills, the elegance of his drafting and his responsiveness to clients. He is sought after for advice on contractual construction: he currently acts for GlaxoSmithKline in a dispute with AstraZeneca about royalties payable under a patent licence; and he successfully appeared for Glencore in a 2-day appeal in the Court of Appeal concerning the interpretation of tax indemnities in an SPA, having previously conducted the 5-day Commercial Court trial. Conall has appeared in the leading cases concerning shareholder remedies for allegedly untrue or misleading information published by listed companies, notably for HP in its mammoth $5 billion Autonomy trial and for Tesco defending claims arising out of historic profit overstatements. Having previously represented British Airways and MAN in large-scale competition damages actions, in 2022 Conall successfully defended Ede & Ravenscroft in an 11-day abuse of dominance trial in the CAT and continues to act for Rabobank in fraud and competition law proceedings in the Financial List alleging USD LIBOR manipulation.

Edwin Peel was called to the Bar and joined One Essex Court in 2014. He is a Visiting Professor in the Oxford University Law Faculty, after over 30 years there as a full time Professor. He has a particular expertise in contract law and private international law. He now acts principally as an arbitrator, but is still instructed on appeals, or in major trials. Prior to becoming a full-time arbitrator, he regularly advised on or appeared in some of the leading cases in litigation, including Cavendish Square Holding BV v Makdessi and Morris-Garner v One Step (Support) Ltd. He is also regularly instructed as an expert witness on English law, having previously appeared in proceedings in the United States, Canada, Spain and Portugal. With experience of LCIA, ICC and LMAA arbitrations, his practice covers disputes in many of the principal industry sectors including banking and finance, construction and engineering, energy and resources, professional services, and shipping and commodities. He has written or edited numerous books, including Treitel on the Law of Contract (five editions) and Frustration and Force Majeure (4th edition).

Sandy is an experienced commercial junior with a broad, multi-jurisdictional practice. His work covers the full range of commercial disputes including, among other things, banking and finance, civil fraud, insolvency and company, sale of goods, and jurisdiction and conflict of laws. He has acted or advised in relation to disputes in English and foreign courts or in arbitrations, as well as in internal or regulatory investigations and Parliamentary inquiries. Alongside his practice, Sandy maintains an active interest in academic law. He has published in areas including banking law, contract, jurisdiction and civil procedure. He is a regular contributor to and is on the Editorial Board of the Journal of International Banking & Financial Law and writes the chapter on guarantees in one of the leading banking law textbooks.

Alexander Polley KC

Alex practises in the field of commercial litigation and arbitration, including banking, civil fraud, professional negligence and general commercial disputes. Recent cases include: Fiesta v Deutsche Bank (alleged derivatives mis-selling); Aabar v Glencore (FSMA section 90 and 90A claims); NMC v EY (alleged audit negligence); Tactus v Jordan [2024] EWHC 399 (Comm) and [2025] 1 WLR 1602 (reverse summary judgment on deceit and conspiracy claims following share sale, and champerty issues on purported assignment of claim); Contra v Bamford [2023] 2 All ER (Comm) 683 (reverse summary judgment on contract claim); Caledonian Maritime v HCCI [2022] EWHC 164 (Ch) (reverse summary judgment on rectification claim); LA Micro v LA Micro [2022] 1 WLR 336 (equitable remedies and estoppel); PCP v Barclays [2021] EWHC 307 (Comm) (alleged deceit by bank in relation to capital raising); and Flowgroup v Co-Op [2021] Bus LR 755 (challenge to expert determination).

Laurence Rabinowitz KC

Recommended in: Banking & Finance, Commercial Dispute Resolution, Energy and Natural Resources, Civil Fraud, Group Litigation, and International Arbitration (General Commercial & Insurance). Regularly instructed in the leading cases of the day, Rabinowitz has been instructed in relation to most of the major commercial litigation passing through the English Courts in the past 30 years, as well as high profile disputes work in overseas courts. In recent years in particular, clients have sought his services on very difficult points of law going on appeal to the Court of Appeal, the Privy Council and the Supreme Court in a variety of sectors. He continues to handle high-profile and precedent-setting cases. Representing Close Brothers in the Supreme Court appeal Hopcraft and another v Close Brothers Limited, defending group claims concerning commission on car purchase loans. Acting for Cobalt in the landmark case Cobalt v HMRC [2024] UKSC 40, which will serve as a leading authority on contractual variations under common law. Representing the appellants in the pivotal Court of Appeal judgment on sanctions regimes, PJSC National Bank Trust v Mint [2023] EWCA Civ 1132. Acting for G4S in Various Claimants v G4S [2023] EWHC 2863 (Ch), a significant case examining the rule in Sharp v Blank. For Everton FC in their appeal against the Premier League's 10-point deduction. Representing the Danish Tax Authority, Skatteforvaltningen, in SKAT v Solo Capital Partners LLP, involving claims of a sophisticated fraud resulting in losses of £1.44 billion; and for the Volkswagen Group in defence of group claims concerning alleged breaches of NOx emissions requirements in diesel vehicles.

Barrister specialising in commercial litigation and arbitration. Extensive advocacy experience, both alone and led, including commercial contracts, civil fraud, professional negligence, banking and finance and costs law.

Philip Roberts KC

Phil’s practice encompasses all aspects of the law of intellectual property and information technology, with a particular specialism and expertise in the areas of e-commerce, internet domain names and the commercial exploitation of computer software. He regularly acts and advises on the intellectual property aspects and commercial aspects of IT disputes. Since 2008 he has been a member of the Experts Review Group of Nominet UK, a panel of senior independent domain name Experts reviewing DRS Decisions and sitting on appeals.

James Ruddell has a broad and busy practice across the full spectrum of commercial disputes (including commercial litigation, banking and finance, civil fraud and international arbitration). He has experience in complex High Court litigation, from pre-action advice and interim injunctions through to trial and appeals to the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. He has been instructed in some of the most substantial litigation before the English courts (including several of The Lawyer’s “Top 20” cases) and has particular recent experience in acting for and against foreign states (or state-related entities) and in significant civil fraud claims. In arbitration, James has experience in disputes administered pursuant to LCIA, SIAC, and UNCITRAL rules, and in bringing arbitration claims before the Commercial Court. In addition to his work as part of a larger counsel team, he also acts as sole counsel in litigation/arbitration and has both trial and procedural/CMC advocacy experience.

Adam Rushworth

Maximilian Schlote

Current highlights of Max’s practice include his work in large group litigation. Max is currently instructed on a number of such cases, for example, the Fundão Dam Litigation, the largest (by number of Claimants) group litigation in England and Wales, where Max acts for the defendant, BHP in the 14 week trial commencing in October 2024. Other recent highlights include: Virgin Enterprises Limited v Brightline Holdings LLC [2023] EWHC 2240 (Comm), a ca. US$115m claim in the Commercial Court arising out of the early termination by Brightline of a 20+ year licensing agreement. Max acted for Virgin in the three-week Commercial Court trial of this matter in July 2023. And SKAT v Solo Capital Partners, a multi-billion claim in the Commercial Court against over 100 defendants arising out of a fraud on SKAT, the Danish revenue authority. Max acted for SKAT in the recent four-week Commercial Court trial of preliminary issues [2023] EWHC 590 (Comm). Max also has considerable experience in the energy sector (e.g., an ICC Arbitration concerning a major gas pipeline infrastructure project (2019), and an LCIA Arbitration concerning a major energy construction project (2017-2019); and in the banking/finance sector, for example, the RBS Rights Issue Litigation; Dana Gas PJSC v Dana Gas Sukuk Limited; and his work in three Madoff-related cases (each in the Privy Council, e.g., Pearson v Primeo Fund (No 2) [2020] UKPC 3.

Oscar Schonfeld

Barrister called in 2014 specialising in: Arbitration Banking and Financial Services Civil fraud Commercial Litigation Company and Insolvency Competition Energy and Natural Resources Jurisdiction and Conflict of Laws Professional Liability Sports Tax and Revenue

Nehali is a leading commercial senior junior, with extensive experience of complex and high-value commercial litigation and international arbitration. She has appeared at all levels in the English Court (including the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal), and in a variety of other Tribunals, both arbitral (e.g. LCIA, ICC, UNCITRAL, SIAC, KLRCA, and LMAA) and regulatory (e.g. RDC) and in expert determination. Nehali practises in all aspects of commercial law, including general commercial, banking, financial services and restructuring, energy, civil fraud, professional negligence, arbitration and jurisdiction. She has previously won Banking Junior of the Year and International Arbitration Junior of the Year, and been nominated for Commercial Dispute Resolution Junior of the Year and Energy Junior of the Year.

Thomas Sharpe KC

Barrister specialising in UK and EC competition law, commercial judicial review, utility regulation and areas where law and economics meet. Former adviser to Ofwat and Ofgem, and now Water Industry Commission for Scotland. Litigation experience in High Court and European Courts includes ENS, the leading case on the rule of reason and ex p Fedesa, the leading case on proportionality; defended Mastercard in the European Courts and in some follow-on actions; secured damages for Albion Water in the CAT; significant fine reductions in builder cartels appeals in CAT; acted for Safeway in two monopoly and one merger inquiry and in Safeway v Twigger on ex turpi causa; about 100 MMC, Competition Commission and CMA inquiries eg mobile phone call termination litigation; challenges to airport charges, supermarkets sundry energy competition issues; funerals; gas and electricity transmission appeals; various RHI cases and water arbitrations. Appeared in Miller I for interveners. Conducted Commission of Inquiry in St Kitts and Nevis 2009.

Nicholas Sloboda KC

Nick’s practice is divided equally between international commercial arbitration and disputes heard in the English courts. Over the years, Nick has acted in some of largest-scale international commercial disputes, frequently within the energy or financial sectors, and often involving allegations of fraud or other wrongdoing. In the last five years Nick has developed a particular expertise in defending group actions – having acted in the two largest ones in English Courts (the Mariana/BHP Fundao dam claim and the VW emissions claim), alongside a number of significant other cases. Nick’s recent work has included the following: For BHP in the Mariana/BHP Fundao group litigation - largest ever group claim brought in England, in respect of an environmental incident in Brazil; For investors in a multibillion ICC arbitration vs a State in respect of an oil shale power plant; For energy multinational in US$5.5bn deceit claim in SIAC arbitration (Singapore seat); For VW group in the VW Emissions group litigation; For BP in gas price review; For Kroll in Dar Al Arkan v Al Refai: fraud dispute relating to Islamic bonds/banking practice For Deutsche Bank in Bilta v Deutsche Bank

Derek Spitz is a leading junior who specialises in commercial litigation, competition, with particular expertise in individual and collective private actions for damages, and international arbitration, regularly representing clients from a range of industries including aerospace, banking and finance, oil and gas, mining, pharmaceutical, retail, tech and telecommunications. With substantial experience in heavy and complex, high value claims, Derek regularly appears as sole counsel, leading counsel or as part of a larger team in proceedings before the CAT, High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court, as well as in arbitrations under UNCTIRAL, LCIA, ICC and AFSA Rules. Ranked in Chambers UK and the Legal 500 continuously, for several years, in the fields of Commercial Litigation and Competition Law, before being called to the English Bar Derek was a leading junior at the Johannesburg Bar where he continues to be a member with expertise in South African law. Recent work includes appearing in Le Patourel v BT on behalf 2.3 million BT customers in the high profile £1bn+ collective proceedings; Interchange – representing various claimants in numerous proceedings including Sainsbury’s (High Court, Court of Appeal and Supreme Court); Ocado (CAT) and on behalf of Merchants in the multi-billion collective proceedings lawsuits “the Commercial Card Claims” (CAT); and Stellantis v Autoliv on behalf of the Defendants in a substantial stand-alone claim concerning alleged cartel conduct.

Veena Srirangam

Veena is regularly instructed in complex and high-value commercial disputes and has appeared before a range of courts and tribunals including the Court of Appeal and the Competition Appeal Tribunal. Veena’s recent instructions include acting for Mastercard in interchange fee litigation and BHP in Municipio de Mariana v BHP Group (UK) Ltd (recognised in The Lawyer’s Top 10 Appeals of 2022 and Top 20 cases of 2020) which is one of the largest group actions (by number of claimants) brought in the English courts. Alongside cases where she acts as part of a counsel team, Veena regularly acts as sole counsel especially for financial institutions. Before coming to the Bar, Veena taught Administrative Law at Cambridge University and has a particular interest in cases raising public law issues. Veena maintains an active interest in academic law and has published in areas including civil procedure, conflict of laws, contract, and public law.

Alyssa Stansbury

Alyssa has a broad commercial practice, with particular interests in civil fraud, banking and finance and shareholder disputes. She regularly acts on high-profile and substantial claims, including recently Privatbank v Kolomoisky & Ors (a US$4.5 billion claim for “fraud on an epic scale” and Lawyer Top 20 case of 2022), ENRC v Dechert LLP, Neil Gerrard and the SFO (a £250 million claim and Lawyer Top 20 case of 2021) and Hamon v UCL (a £40 million claim by c.5000 students for teaching affected by COVID-19 and strikes). Alyssa is increasingly instructed as sole counsel and to conduct advocacy in cases where she is part of a larger team.

Harry’s practice spans the full spectrum of international commercial disputes, but centres on secrets and lies – fraud, bribery, and libel claims, especially with a conflict of laws or jurisdictional element. As part of a team, he has acted in some of the largest and most complex pieces of litigation in history, including for 1MDB, Skat, and Russian and Ukrainian oligarchs – three of them featured in The Lawyer’s Top 20 Cases for the year. He regularly acts as sole counsel in the High Court and Court of Appeal, including representing MeToo complainants against prominent public figures. He also appears in offshore proceedings, tax appeals and arbitrations. Before joining One Essex Court, Harry qualified as a solicitor in Australia in 2018; worked at a magic circle firm in London; and won the world championships of the Jessup moot, the largest and most prestigious mooting competition in the world. Outside of work, Harry’s hobbies are more work. He maintains a lively pro bono practice (and is on the 2025 Pro Bono Recognition List), including establishing that it is not defamatory to denounce someone as the Antichrist, and making a claim of racial discrimination against Oxford University. He is one of the co-authors of the leading textbook on English court rules, Zuckerman’s Civil procedure (4th ed and 5th ed forthcoming), and sits on the General Council of the Bar. He previously taught advocacy to undergraduate mooters at Oxford University and Sydney University. He is also a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators and has been called to the Bar of the Republic of Ireland.

Nicholas Strauss KC

Barrister specialising in commercial and chancery litigation and professional negligence; keen on appellate work; considerable experience as arbitrator, including international LCIA, ICC and LMAA arbitrations as well as ad hoc; enjoys work as sole arbitrator; mediation with preference for early neutral evaluation; experience as expert witness.

Ben Strong KC practices across a wide range of commercial disputes, both in litigation and arbitration. He is also frequently asked to advise on contracts in all commercial fields. Ben is praised for his clear advocacy style, strategic judgment, attention to the detail of his cases, and ease to work with. His most recent cases have been in the areas of banking, including derivatives and CDOs/CLOs; financial services, including regulatory disputes; jurisdiction disputes and conflict of laws; joint venture and shareholder disputes; and professional negligence. He also has a long standing practice in company law, corporate acquisitions and disposals civil fraud and asset tracing, and commercial aspects of tax litigation. Significant recent cases include: the final 7 years of an international arbitration of disputes between joint venture partners in the Middle East; 12 years of claims between a Dutch social housing association and various banks relating to the corruption of its treasurer and a EUR 25bn derivatives portfolio; 2-4 week trials in the Upper Tribunal of challenges to FCA decisions to prohibit individuals from financial services roles (FCA v Tinney, FCA v Hussein, FCA v Seiler); a 3 day hearing of an application for an anti-suit injunction (BRG v Kowski); the Court of Appeal decision on the treatment of negative interest in the ISDA Master Agreement (Netherlands v Deutsche Bank) and the most recent Privy Council consideration of causation in contractual damages (Global Water v AG of BVI).

Christopher Style KC

King's Counsel and international commercial arbitrator. Has 40 years experience of international dispute resolution, including acting as counsel and as arbitrator in institutional and ad hoc references involving many systems of law and with seats in many of the centres of international arbitration. Practice includes disputes in many of the principal industry sectors, including banking and finance, energy and resources, construction and infrastructure, professional services, shipping and commodities, transport, hospitality and leisure, insurance, healthcare and pharmaceuticals, and technology and telecommunications. CEDR accredited mediator.

Michael J Sullivan KC

Michael Sullivan K.C. specialises in energy, banking and other commercial disputes. He has recently successfully represented the Republic of Kenya in three arbitrations concerning energy disputes as well as successfully representing Kenya in an ICSID Annulment application: ICSID Case No ARB/15/29. He recently acted for the Republic of India in the successful defence of an application to set aside an award under a BIT. He recently represented Zambia Consolidated Copper Mines in an arbitration concerning Africa’s largest copper mine and is presently representing the Republic of Zambia in a large-scale ICSID arbitration. He has successfully represented the Republic of Zambia in a number of arbitrations and in the vulture fund case which led to international notoriety of the activities of funds acquiring distressed sovereign debt in Africa. He successfully represented East Africa Development Bank in disputes in the Tanzanian Courts: [2011] TLR 1 and is currently representing it in proceedings in the High Court of Kenya, the Court of Appeal of Kenya, the Court of Appeal of Uganda and the East African Court of Justice. He successfully represented H.E. President Museveni in the English High Court. He has led substantial arbitrations in Russia, including cases for the Russian state-owned oil company. He is presently representing the Republic of Kenya and a Far-Eastern State in large-scale arbitrations. Michael sits as an Arbitrator, most recently concerning energy, financial and aviation disputes. Recently Michael was awarded the honour of Order of the Grand Warrior of Kenya for his service to the Republic of Kenya.

Ian is a CEDR accredited mediator specialising in mediating all forms of commercial disputes. He has broad commercial experience and is a former Head of Dispute Resolution at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, where he was a partner for 30 years. In his former career he represented clients in many of the leading commercial disputes of the day, involving many business sectors and jurisdictions. He has mediated disputes in a number of different market sectors.

Sonia Tolaney KC

Specialises in commercial litigation and arbitration, in particular domestic and international banking (including all aspects of credit and security), domestic and international commercial fraud and asset tracing, corporate and personal insolvency, professional negligence and insurance and reinsurance. Some notable cases include: Deutsche Bank AG v Provincia di Brescia (Comm) (2022); Deutsche Bank v Busto di Arsizio [2021] EWHC 2706 (Comm); Qatar Airways v Airbus (2022); Lehman Brothers Holdings Plc and LB Holdings Intermediate 2 Limited [2021] EWCA Civ 1523; Vale v Steinmetz [2021] EWCA Civ 1087; WEX v Travelport [2020] EWHC 2670 (Comm); Sabbagh v Khoury [2019] EWHC 3004 (Comm); LLB Verwaltung (Switzerland) AG v Group Seven & Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 614; Deutsche Bank v Unitech [2019] EWHC 969 (Comm); ECU v HSBC [2018] EWHC 3045 (Comm); Privatbank v Kolomoisky [2018] EWHC 3308 (Ch); Deutsche Bank v Savona [2018] EWCA Civ 1740; Greenwood v Goodwin – RBS Rights Litigation [2017]; Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (In Administration) v. Deutsche Bank & Bank of New York Mellon [2016]; Rosneft v. HM Treasury [2015] EWHC 248; Kaupthing Singer & Friedlander v. UBS [2014] EWHC 2540 (Comm); Deutsche Bank v. Sebastian Holdings [2014] EWCA Civ 1100; HSH Nordbank AG v. Intesa Sanpaolo SpA [2014] EWHC 142; Berezovsky v. Abramovich [2012] EWHC 2463 (Comm); Centrica v. Accenture [2010] EWCA Civ 912; UBS AG v. HSH Nordbank AG [2009] EWCA Civ 585 (CA); British Energy Power & Energy Trading Ltd v. Credit Suisse [2007] 2 Lloyds’s Rep 427; and Morgan Grenfell v. Arrows Autosports Limited [2004] All ER (D) 76.

Daniel Toledano KC

Daniel is a leading commercial law silk. He has built up a formidable practice over thirty years at the bar and is regularly chosen by the top law firms to advise clients and to appear before various tribunals in a wide range of disputes. He is known for his expertise in all kinds of commercial contract disputes, and in banking and finance, energy, international trade and sale of goods as well as for his work in the areas of civil fraud and sports law. He has extensive experience in jurisdiction disputes and in disputes governed by foreign laws, as well as in group actions. He regularly appears in the Commercial Court and in the appellate courts, and also devotes much of his time to his strong arbitration practice involving hearings both in London and abroad under the auspices of different arbitral institutions. Recent cases include: acting for BHP in the Fundao dam group action; acting for the Virgin Group in disputes concerning the licensing of its IP rights in the Commercial Court and in the Court of Appeal; acting for General Dynamics in the Supreme Court in its claim against the state of Libya; acting in Commercial Court proceedings concerning the banking and financial crisis in Lebanon; and acting as lead counsel in a major ICC arbitration concerning a power station and the price of electricity generated.

Niranjan Venkatesan

Niranjan was appointed King’s Counsel in 2025 after only nine years in practice.. Before taking silk, he was one of the leading juniors at the Commercial Bar (Legal500 Junior of the Year 2023; C&P Commercial Dispute Resolution Junior of the Year 2024; ranked in C&P Band 1). He is generally instructed as lead advocate in complex commercial litigation and in international arbitration. He also has extensive appellate experience, having appeared eight times in the Supreme Court and on multiple occasions in the Court of Appeal. He is often brought into appeals and is known for his ability to find solutions in difficult cases. Before coming to the Bar, he read and taught law at Oxford where he was a Vinerian, Eldon and Rhodes scholar. Current or recent cases include: Invest Bank v El-Husseini (Commercial Court); DP World v Soprim (Commercial Court); Gormsen v Meta (Competition Appeal Tribunal); Hopcraft v Close Brothers (Supreme Court); Watford Control Instruments v Brown (Chancery Division); BAT Industries plc v Sequana [2022] 3 WLR 709 (Supreme Court and Court of Appeal); Grand View Private Trust Co v Wong [2022] UKPC 47; PJSC NBT v Mints [2023] EWHC 118 (Comm), [2022] EWHC 871 (Comm); Enka v Chubb [2020] 1 WLR 4117 (Supreme Court and Court of Appeal). He is also called to the Indian Bar (non-practising) and is able to advise on matters of Indian law.

Michael Watkins

All areas of commercial law.

Barrister practising across a broad range of commercial litigation and arbitration.

David Wolfson KC

David Wolfson (Lord Wolfson of Tredegar, KC) practises across a broad range of commercial law, both in litigation and international arbitration, specialising in banking, finance and insolvency law, professional negligence, domestic and international sale of goods, arbitration (domestic and international), jurisdiction disputes and sports law. David has been instructed in many major banking and commercial disputes, and also accepts appointments as Arbitrator (both sole arbitrator and as part of a panel). David served as Minister of Justice in the House of Lords (2020-22), and continues to contribute to the work of the House, speaking in particular on issues of law and justice. He is also the Chair of the Football Regulatory Authority.

Stephanie has a broad commercial practice, including litigation and international arbitration. Stephanie has experience acting in a range of complex, high value cases including in the areas of banking and financial services, civil fraud, competition law and professional negligence, amongst others. Stephanie has appeared led and unled in the High Court, as well as conducting hearings in the County Court. Recent and notable instructions include: Phones 4U Ltd (in administration) v EE Limited & Ors: For the Claimant in a 10-week trial in summer 2022 of an Article 101 TFEU claim against EE, Vodafone and O2 and their parent companies arising from alleged cartel conduct between those companies that caused Phones4u to cease trading and enter into administration in 2014. Municipio de Mariana v BHP [2020] EWHC 2930 (TCC): For the Defendants in an 8-day jurisdiction challenge and strike out application against a group action brought by over 200,000 claimants arising out of the collapse of the Fundão Dam in Brazil DuPont Pension Trust v Yuksel Insaat AS: For the claimants in a deceit claim in the Commercial Court brought by international investors against a Turkish construction company and its directors in connection with failed financial restructuring. AssetCo plc v. Grant Thornton LLP UK LLP [2019] EWHC 150 (Comm); [2019] EWHC 191 (Comm), [2019] EWHC 592 (Comm) and [2020] EWCA Civ 1151: For the defendant in an audit negligence claim in the Commercial Court, and on appeal in the Court of Appeal. The claims gave rise to questions of: duties owed by auditors, the 'loss of a chance' doctrine, intervening acts and the 'very thing' principle, and issues of contributory fault. VR Partners v Exotix v CVI [2017] EWHC 2620 (Comm): For the Third Party investment fund in an 8-day Commercial Court trial concerning the construction of a back-to-back trade of valuable Ukrainian loan interests and entitlement to unwind said trade.

Ben Zelenka Martin

Ben has a broad practice covering all areas of commercial dispute resolution and arbitration. He has worked on a variety of competition and commercial disputes, involving mergers and acquisitions, civil fraud, banking and finance, shareholder disputes, and jurisdiction challenges. He is currently instructed by the Danish Tax and Customs Administration in a claim relating to an alleged conspiracy involving fraudulent withholding tax reclaim applications in the sum of DKK 12 billion (approximately £1.5 billion). The case featured in The Lawyer’s “Top 20 Cases” for 2021 and has been described by Foxton J as “one of the largest and most complex pieces of litigation to be heard in the Commercial Court.