Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

VIDEO · 04 DECEMBER 2021

Which Arbitration Rules Should I Choose? (Video)

Khaitan & Co.
Khaitan & Co.
Contributor
Khaitan & Co.

Khaitan & Co.

Founded in 1911, Khaitan & Co is a heritage law firm that has been a trusted adviser to leading...

View firm profile
Explore more from Khaitan & Co.

Our recent webinar "Which arbitration rules should I choose?" attracted a great deal of attention not only in India but around the world from more than 45 other countries.

IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Raj Panchmatia
Raj Panchmatia
Kingshuk Banerjee
Kingshuk Banerjee
Author LinkedIn connections

Our recent webinar "Which arbitration rules should I choose?" attracted a great deal of attention not only in India but around the world from more than 45 other countries. The webinar was very well received and we wanted to give you the opportunity to see the recording. The webinar explores the major differences in approach and in the rules of 4 leading international arbitration institutions namely ICC, LCIA, SIAC and MCIA, with presentations from senior executives from each of those organizations, along with insights from our partners Raj Panchmatia and Kingshuk Banerjee.

self

The content of this document do not necessarily reflect the views/position of Khaitan & Co but remain solely those of the author(s). For any further queries or follow up please contact Khaitan & Co at [email protected]

The content of this document does not necessarily reflect the views / position of Khaitan & Co but remain solely those of the author(s). For any further queries or follow up, please contact Khaitan & Co at [email protected].

Related Articles

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Assessing The Viability Of An Appellate Arbitral Tribunal In India

The proposal to introduce an Appellate Arbitral Tribunal (AAT) into India’s arbitration architecture, most prominently reflected in the Draft Arbitration & Conciliation (Amendment) Bill, 2024, has rekindled debate over the proper balance between party autonomy, finality, institutional quality, and judicial supervision. Proponents portray an AAT as an institutional innovation that would enhance the quality of awards, promote consistency, and reduce the burden on courts. Critics warn that an appellate layer risks destroying arbitration’s comparative advantage by permitting merits review, increasing costs and delay, and departing from the international norm of limited judicial interference.
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
MZM Legal, Advocates & Legal Consultants
MZM Legal, Advocates & Legal Consultants
Article

No Appeal Beyond Section 37: Bombay High Court Holds That The Commercial Courts Act Cannot Provide An Alternative Appellate Route To Challenge An Order Recording Satisfaction Of An Arbitral Award In Execution Proceedings

The Hon’ble Bombay High Court (“High Court”) in its judgment dated 20.07.2026 in Reliance Asset Reconstruction Co. Ltd. vs. Hiroo Hotchand Advani (Commercial Appeal (L) Nos. 14725 and 15441 of 2026), provided much needed clarity on a pertinent issue, being, whether a party aggrieved by an executing court's order in arbitration proceedings can appeal that order under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (“CCA”), or whether the right of appeal depends on the order fitting within the narrow categories carved out under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”).
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
King, Stubb & Kasiva
King, Stubb & Kasiva
Article

Harmonizing Indian Arbitration With Global Standards: The Role Of The Redfern Schedule In Efficient Document Disclosure

Document production in arbitration has traditionally been a contentious and resource-intensive phase, particularly in complex international commercial disputes. As arbitration solidifies its role as the preferred mechanism for resolving cross-border disputes, the imperative for efficient, transparent, and predictable disclosure procedures has become increasingly evident. In the Indian context, the arbitral landscape has undergone significant reform in recent years, with the enactment and amendment of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, seeking to align domestic practices with internationally recognized standards.
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
MZM Legal, Advocates & Legal Consultants
MZM Legal, Advocates & Legal Consultants
Article

Arbitration Awards On The Clock: Legal And Practical Implications Of Delayed Awards

Arbitration has long been heralded as the faster, more flexible alternative to litigation. Parties choose it to avoid the procedural labyrinths and backlog of national courts, expecting a swift resolution delivered by subject-matter experts. Yet in practice, arbitration often fails to live up to this promise. Tribunals may take months, or even years, after the close of hearings to deliver their awards.
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
MZM Legal, Advocates & Legal Consultants
MZM Legal, Advocates & Legal Consultants
Article

Newsletter August Disputes

This newsletter examines recent Supreme Court judgments across arbitration, civil law, criminal law, insolvency, and white-collar crime. Key rulings address the binding of non-signatories to arbitration agreements, the scope of "industry" under the Industrial Disputes Act, limitations on FIR registration following Section 156(3) rejections, and the evidentiary requirements for proving bribery demands under the Prevention of Corruption Act.
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Phoenix Legal
Phoenix Legal
Article

Khan Market's Fire NOC Dispute: How The Delhi High Court Balanced Safety And Structural Limits

Behind Khan Market’s busy cafés and restaurants lies a less visible problem: many of the market’s older buildings were never designed to meet modern fire-safety standards. Several restaurants operate from the first and second floors, which are reached through narrow staircases and, in some cases, only one practical entry and exit route. This structural limitation became a legal issue when the New Delhi Municipal Council (“NDMC”) linked the renewal of restaurant permissions to obtaining a fire no-objection certificate (“Fire NOC”).
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
S.S. Rana & Co.
S.S. Rana & Co.
Article

Supreme Court Refers Validity Of Pre-Deposit Conditions For Invoking Arbitration For Larger Bench Consideration

In a recent decision in Santosh Associate Private Limited vs. Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. [2026 INSC 872], the Supreme Court of India ("Supreme Court"), while examining a contractual stipulation requiring a contractor to furnish a security deposit before reference of disputes to arbitration, expressed serious reservations regarding onerous pre-deposit conditions that may deter access to arbitration.
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Trinity Chambers
Trinity Chambers
Article

Supreme Court Upholds Post-Award Section 9 Relief For An Unsuccessful Party In Rare And Compelling Circumstances

In a recent decision in National Projects Construction Corporation Ltd. vs. Ishvakoo (India) Pvt. Ltd. [2026 INSC 828], the Supreme Court of India ("Supreme Court") upheld a direction requiring a party to deposit INR 3.5 crore with the High Court pending adjudication of a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("Arbitration Act"), even though the applicant seeking interim protection under Section 9 had been unsuccessful in the arbitral proceedings.
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Trinity Chambers
Trinity Chambers
Article

When Does The Internet Create Territorial Jurisdiction? Re-thinking The Geography Of IP Litigation In India

The Delhi High Court's reference to a Larger Bench examines a fundamental question: when does online commercial activity establish territorial jurisdiction in intellectual property disputes? As digital commerce erases traditional geographical boundaries, courts must determine whether website accessibility, targeted advertising, or completed transactions create sufficient legal nexus with a particular forum.
IndiaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Hammurabi & Solomon Partners
Hammurabi & Solomon Partners
Article

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability Of SARFAESI Remedies For A Secured Creditor Who Acquires An NPA From A Non-notified NBFC

In Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v Trupti Sanjay Mehta and Others, 2026 INSC 943 (Kotak Mahindra), the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India considered whether a bank as defined under Section 2(1)(c) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) could invoke the provisions of the SARFAESI Act to recover a secured debt acquired from an entity which was not covered under the ambit of the SARFAESI Act at the time of disbursement of the loan.
IndiaFinance and Banking
Khaitan & Co.
Khaitan & Co.
Article

Ministry Of Labour And Employment Operationalises The Provisions On Payment Of Statutory Bonus

On 25 August 2026, the Ministry of Labour and Employment issued two notifications (Notifications) under the Code on Wages, 2019 (Wage Code), thereby operationalising specified provisions relating to payment of statutory bonus for establishments for which the appropriate government is the Central Government. The Wage Code consolidates the legislative framework governing wages and related employee entitlements, including the regime previously governed by the Payment of Bonus Act, 1965.
IndiaEmployment and HR
Khaitan & Co.
Khaitan & Co.
Article

B2B Marketplaces Are Not Exempted Under Consumer Protection Act 2019

The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) imposed a penalty of Rs 10 lakhs on Dial4Trade Technologies Private Limited (Dial4Trade) for listing a regulated product, i.e., Ammonium Nitrate, on its e-commerce platform without any regulatory disclosures or warnings. The CCPA found Dial4Trade in violation of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 (the Act), Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules, 2020 (E-Commerce Rules) read with the Explosives Act, 1884 and Ammonium Nitrate Rules, 2012.
IndiaConsumer Protection
Khaitan & Co.
Khaitan & Co.
Article

Taxability Of Corporate Guarantees Under GST Laws: Analysis Of The Recent Gujarat High Court Decision In Torrent Power Ltd. v Union Of India

The issue of taxability of corporate guarantees issued by a holding company to a financial institution for the benefit of its subsidiary company emerged as one of the most contentious issues in the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime pursuant to the introduction of the levy in 2023. The controversy centers on a fundamental question: when a holding company furnishes a corporate guarantee, without charging any fee from its subsidiary company, to a bank to enable its subsidiary to secure credit facilities, does such activity constitute a taxable “supply of services” under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act)?
IndiaTax
Khaitan & Co.
Khaitan & Co.
Article

SEBI Clarifies Scope Of Regulation 62A: Transfer Of Unlisted NCDs Under A Business Transfer Arrangement Does Not Circumvent Listing Requirements

Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) in its recent informal guidance dated 20 July 2026 (Informal Guidance), has clarified that Regulation 62A of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, as amended (LODR Regulations), applies to outstanding unlisted non-convertible debentures, which was are transferred to a debt listed entity pursuant to any corporate restructuring or business transfer.
IndiaFinance and Banking
Khaitan & Co.
Khaitan & Co.