Two recent cases have reached opposite conclusions about what counts as a "contaminant" under Ontario's Environmental Protection Act (EPA). Neither case seems to make much environmental sense. Why is flyrock a "contaminant", when reflected light that lures millions of birds to their deaths is not? Why does the EPA, and the Ministry of the Environment, protect buildings but not wildlife?
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.


