Ontario Election Call Kills Proposed Environmental Laws

On September 3, 2026, amendments to Canada's Physical Activities Regulations came into force, removing several project categories from federal Impact Assessment Act oversight and consolidating review authority with the Canada Energy Regulator. These changes eliminate overlapping federal review processes for international and interprovincial pipelines, electrical transmission lines, and certain energy facilities, aiming to streamline major project approvals while raising questions about Indigenous

Minimum fines for provincial environmental offences in Quebec have significantly increased for companies operating in certain industrial sectors.

The Government of Canada has amended regulations under the Impact Assessment Act to streamline environmental reviews for major infrastructure projects, particularly interprovincial pipelines. These changes shift regulatory responsibility for certain energy projects to the Canada Energy Regulator while removing other project types from federal review following the Supreme Court's 2024 constitutional ruling.

On July 18, 2026, Environment and Climate Change Canada (“ECCC”) published a Notice of Intent to develop a new regulation under the Species at Risk Act (“SARA”) for the protection of the critical...

Canada is proposing to eliminate its federal zero-emission vehicle sales mandate and replace it with technology-neutral greenhouse gas emission standards. The shift comes amid declining EV sales, affordability concerns, and trade uncertainty with the United States, raising questions about how the automotive industry will balance climate goals with market realities. What will this regulatory transformation mean for manufacturers, consumers, and Canada's electrification timeline?

Le régime québécois de sanctions pénales en matière d'environnement a été considérablement renforcé pour certains secteurs industriels, avec des amendes minimales multipliées par dix pour des infractions spécifiques. Les modifications réglementaires entrées en vigueur en août 2026 visent neuf catégories d'activités industrielles à haut risque environnemental, transformant radicalement l'exposition financière des entrep

Le ministère de l'Environnement de l'Ontario propose d'importants changements aux règles de délivrance des permis environnementaux qui pourraient faire économiser aux exploitants des dizaines de milliers de dollars en 2026. Cette proposition remplacerait la date butoir fixe du 31 janvier 2027 pour l'enregistrement au REAS par une approche fondée sur l'existence de changements aux activités des installations. Quelles sont les implications pour les installations industrielles ont

Starting August 13, 2026, certain companies engaged in industrial activities deemed high-risk will be subject to minimum fines ten times higher in the event of a violation of the Environment Quality Act (EQA). This reform is part of a broader trend aimed at strengthening the deterrent effect of environmental sanctions and encouraging companies to ensure their compliance with applicable legislative and regulatory requirements.

À compter du 13 août 2026, certaines entreprises exerçant des activités industrielles jugées à risque élevé s'exposent à des amendes minimales dix fois plus élevées en cas d'infraction à la Loi sur la qualité de l'environnement (LQE). Cette réforme s'inscrit dans une tendance plus large visant à renforcer l'effet dissuasif des sanctions environnementales et inciter les entreprises à s’assurer de leur conformité aux exigences législatives et réglementaires applicables.

La réglementation des substances chimiques au Canada évolue rapidement, créant des risques juridiques et opérationnels importants pour les entreprises. Les obligations de conformité s'étendent désormais bien au-delà des simples interdictions de substances, englobant la documentation rigoureuse, la transparence de la chaîne d'approvisionnement et une surveillance réglementaire continue sous le régime de la Loi canadienne sur la protection de l'environnem

A foreign franchisor has delivered a compliant Franchise Disclosure Document to a promising Canadian candidate. The fourteen-day period is running. Site selection is underway. Then, eight days in, something happens: the landlord renegotiates a lease term, a key supplier is replaced, an executive who is named in the disclosure document resigns, or the franchisor is served with a claim that did not exist when the FDD was assembled.

A serious traumatic brain injury can affect far more than a person’s physical health. Many people experience ongoing problems with memory, attention, fatigue, emotional regulation, relationships, and work. In the most severe cases, these impairments may qualify as a catastrophic impairment under Ontario’s Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule (“SABS”).

As students across Ontario prepare to head back to school, our roads will once again become busier with school buses, young pedestrians, cyclists, and families making their way to and from school.

Canada's federal government has announced a $3.5 billion rapid response support package in anticipation of retaliatory tariffs against the United States, introducing new temporary employment insurance measures and workforce retention programs. The package extends EI benefits, waives waiting periods, and creates funding opportunities for employers to retain and retrain workers rather than implement large-scale layoffs.

Foreign franchisors expanding into Canada often possess financial statements prepared under various accounting frameworks. Understanding whether existing audited, reviewed, or compiled statements satisfy Canadian franchise disclosure requirements is essential to avoid costly delays and legal exposure. This analysis examines the critical distinction between accounting standards and assurance standards...

Recent amendments to Ontario's freedom of information laws have sparked controversy by creating exceptions for ministerial records, while the federal government introduces sweeping privacy legislation...

Foreign franchisors expanding into Canada face critical decisions about accepting deposits before providing franchise disclosure. Understanding when a refundable deposit crosses legal boundaries can determine whether your franchise relationship begins on solid ground or creates statutory rescission risks that emerge after substantial investment.

The Ontario Court of Appeal has issued a landmark decision that may finally bring predictability to termination clause litigation. For years, employment agreements have been struck down over seemingly harmless phrases, leaving employers and employees uncertain about enforceability. Will this new ruling restore common sense to contractual interpretation, or will technical challenges continue to dominate employment law disputes?

Since 2019, Siskinds LLP has represented the plaintiffs in proposed JUUL class actions across Canada, alleging that the e-cigarette devices are hazardous products but were falsely marketed as a desirable, safe and healthier alternative to smoking. These Canadian lawsuits allege the defendants failed to properly inform Canadians, especially children, adolescents and young adults, of the dangers associated with the use of JUUL products.

When professionals entrusted with the care of children exploit their positions of authority for harmful purposes, the impact extends far beyond the abusive acts themselves. This examination explores the complex dynamics of institutional sexual abuse, the barriers survivors face in coming forward, and the legal pathways available for pursuing accountability when systems fail to protect those in their care.