Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

The Legal 500 Hall of Fame Icon The Legal 500 Hall of Fame highlights individuals who have received constant praise by their clients for continued excellence. The Hall of Fame highlights, to clients, the law firm partners who are at the pinnacle of the profession. In the United Kingdon, the criteria for entry is to have been recognised by The Legal 500 as one of the elite leading lawyers for eight years. These partners are highlighted below and throughout the editorial.
Click here for more details

United Kingdom > East Midlands > Projects, energy and natural resources > Private finance initiative (PFI) > Law firm and leading lawyer rankings



Browne Jacobson LLP's government and infrastructure department is renowned for its work on large and high-profile projects, and it has a particularly sizeable following of public sector clients (including local and central government, and local authorities), although work from private sector clients is another pillar of the practice. The team in Nottingham is led by Craig Elder, whose experience includes PFI/PPP projects, and also those in areas such as waste management, defence, energy and health. Anja Beriro and associate Alex Kynoch are also recommended.

Practice head(s):Craig Elder

Key Clients

Chichester District Council

London Borough of Havering

London Borough of Ealing

London Borough of Enfield

Melton Borough Council

Lincolnshire County Council

Blackpool Borough Council

Manchester City Council

Walsall Council

London Borough of Croydon

Prospect Law Ltd has established a market-leading reputation in the energy and infrastructure sector, where it undertakes contentious and non-contentious work for banks, developers and governments, among other clients. The firm's international reach is a hallmark of the practice, and it is making an increased push for work from the Middle East. In addition to fielding a multidisciplinary team of legal experts, the firm also has an in-house group of electrical engineers, surveyors and other professionals. The firm is increasingly becoming an active player in the nuclear energy sector, where it is sought out to advise on £1bn-plus contracts. It has a particular strength in the operation and decommissioning of nuclear sites. Work in the renewable energy sector is also growing. On the contentious front, clients are able to count on the experience of the firm's in-house barristers, such as Edmund Robb, who heads up the contentious practice. Edward de la Billiere specialises in the commercial and regulatory aspects of energy projects. Both Robb and de la Billiere divide their time between the East Midlands and London, as do Jonathan Leech and Rupert Cowen.

Practice head(s):Edward de la Billiere; Edmund Robb

Other key lawyers:Jonathan Leech; Rupert Cowen

Key Clients

Countryside Renewables Limited

Underwater Construction Corporation UK Limited

Envirofusion Limited

The Radioactive Material Transport Users Committee

Brooke Energy Group

Waste Facilities Audit Association

Glen Conan Hydro Partnership LLP

Low Level Waste Repository

Molegrove (Civils) Limited

UK Nuclear Waste Management

Work highlights

  • Advised Brooke Energy Group, an installer and operator for biomass energy systems, in relation to various issues surrounding entitlement to Renewable Heat Incentive payments from Ofgem.
  • Acted for Envirofusion on a public law challenge to the grant of planning permission for its circa £25m energy from waste project in Derby.
  • Advised Countryside Renewables on a technical dispute with Scottish Power, the distribution network operator in this instance, which provided a technical specification and associated quote for a new grid connection for a multi-MW PV plant in Wales.
  • Prospect advised Skye Hydro on a challenge raised by Ofgem into the effectiveness of the commissioning of the client’s hydro-electric scheme.
  • Instructed by Underwater Construction Corporation UK to deploy in-house regulatory and business consultants, alongside lawyers, to identify and assess business opportunities and advise on contracting terms and risk.

Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP plays roles on a wide variety of domestic and international projects, with the work spanning areas such as clean energy, oil and gas, transport and social infrastructure. In Nottingham, principal associate William Spickett advises the Department for Transport on rail franchise and rolling stock issues, and he also assists other clients with PFI and PF2 projects in the education, social housing and blue light sectors. Senior associate Mike Turner supports clients in global PPP and infrastructure projects; his projects experience has covered more than 25 countries.

Practice head(s):Robert Pitcher (London); Alex Doughty (London); Michelle Davies (Cardiff); Jubilee Easo (London); Dominic Lacey (Cambridge); Mark Dennison (London)

Other key lawyers:William Spickett; Mike Turner

Key Clients

Deutsche Bahn




Pensions Infrastructure Platform




Rwanda Development Board


Work highlights

  • Together with local counsel, the firm advised the International Finance Corporation (part of the World Bank Group) on the implementation of the Philippines Health PPP, for the delivery of a new cancer treatment centre at the Philippine General Hospital.
  • Together with local counsel in Canada, advised a consortium bidding for the Toronto Metrolink Project. The project involves the delivery of more than $20bn in fixed infrastructure and rolling stock investments whilst simultaneously continuing to operate the vital transit service without severe disruption.
  • Advising Light Rail Manila Corporation on a programme of works for the Manila Light Rail Transit – Line 1.

At Nelsons Solicitors Limited, a cross-practice team advises energy sector clients on various matters, such as property issues (leases and licences, deeds of easements), corporate work (such as acquisitions and disposals of interests in energy companies) and employment law matters. Contentious work is another area of activity. Martin Jinks in Derby is a key contact.

Practice head(s):Martin Jinks

Interview with...

Law firm partners and practice heads explain how their firms are adapting to clients' changing needs

Interview with...

Law firm partners and practice heads explain how their firms are adapting to clients' changing needs

GC Diversity and Inclusion Report

In partnership with...

Interview with...

Law firm partners and practice heads explain how their firms are adapting to clients' changing needs

International comparative guides

Giving the in-house community greater insight to the law and regulations in different jurisdictions.

Select Practice Area

GC Diversity and Inclusion Report

In partnership with...

Press releases

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‚Äėcentre of life test‚Äô in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of¬† ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan ¬† [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the ‚ÄúRegulations‚ÄĚ). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess ¬†Surinder Singh ¬†cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a¬† sole representative visa ¬†is not ‚Äúa¬† majority shareholder in the overseas business‚ÄĚ.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has ¬†‚Äėpreviously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules‚Äô,¬† the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11).¬†
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (‚Äúthe 2014 Act‚ÄĚ) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal.¬†The¬† explanatory notes ¬†to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the¬† Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ¬†(‚Äúthe 2002 Act‚ÄĚ). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.

Press Releases in the UK

The latest news direct from law firms. If you would like to submit press releases for your firm, send an email request to