Mentions
Profile
Position
Intellectual Property, Information Technology, Commercial disputes including arbitrations involving technology; patents, trademarks, passing off, copyright, designs, confidential information, malicious falsehood. Advice, drafting and advocacy both in the UK (IPEC, Patents Court, Chancery Division, CA, SC) and the EPO. Cases include: Xiaomi v Asus [2025-] (FRAND); Lufthansa v Astronics [2022-2026] (account of profits); Bayer v Sandoz [2024-] (interim injunctions & inquiry on cross-undertaking); Remfry v GKN [2024] (striking out of patent infringement claim); Alcatel Lucent v Amazon [2024-2025] (RAND licensing); R2 v Intel [2023] (voltage regulators); IPBridge v Huawei [2023] (mobiles); Rhodia v Neo [2018-2023] (ceric oxides, also damages enquiry); AutoStore v Ocado [2022-2023] (robots); Illumina v Latvia [2020-2021] (nucleic acid sequencing); Conversant v Huawei [2018-2020] (mobiles); Actavis v Warner-Lambert [2015-2018] (Supreme Court, pregabalin for pain, second medical use patents); Edwards v Boston [2017] (heart valves); GSK v Wyeth [2017] (damages enquiry); Chromatography column [2015] (EPO opposition); HTC v Gemalto [2013] (computer software, mobiles); Nokia v HTC [2013] (mobiles); Resolution v Lundbeck [2013] (estoppel, privity); Fabio Perini v PCMC [2009-2012] (mechanical patent, also damages inquiry).
Contributing author of “Terrell on the Law of Patents”.
Career
Called 2004, Lincoln's Inn.
Memberships
Education
Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge (2002 MA Hons Natural Sciences, Neuroscience); ICSL (2004, BVC); City University (2003 Diploma in Law CPE).
Content supplied by Three New Square