Three New Square Intellectual Property logo

Three New Square Intellectual Property

Show options

Arbitrators

Miles Copeland

Position

Intellectual Property, Information Technology, Commercial disputes including arbitrations involving technology; patents, trademarks, passing off, copyright, designs, confidential information, malicious falsehood. Advice, drafting and advocacy both in the UK (IPEC, Patents Court, Chancery Division, CA, SC) and the EPO. Cases include: Xiaomi v Asus [2025-] (FRAND); Lufthansa v Astronics [2022-2026] (account of profits); Bayer v Sandoz [2024-] (interim injunctions & inquiry on cross-undertaking); Remfry v GKN [2024] (striking out of patent infringement claim); Alcatel Lucent v Amazon [2024-2025] (RAND licensing); R2 v Intel [2023] (voltage regulators); IPBridge v Huawei [2023] (mobiles); Rhodia v Neo [2018-2023] (ceric oxides, also damages enquiry); AutoStore v Ocado [2022-2023] (robots); Illumina v Latvia [2020-2021] (nucleic acid sequencing); Conversant v Huawei [2018-2020] (mobiles); Actavis v Warner-Lambert [2015-2018] (Supreme Court, pregabalin for pain, second medical use patents); Edwards v Boston [2017] (heart valves); GSK v Wyeth [2017] (damages enquiry); Chromatography column [2015] (EPO opposition); HTC v Gemalto [2013] (computer software, mobiles); Nokia v HTC [2013] (mobiles); Resolution v Lundbeck [2013] (estoppel, privity); Fabio Perini v PCMC [2009-2012] (mechanical patent, also damages inquiry).

Contributing author of “Terrell on the Law of Patents”.

Career

Called 2004, Lincoln's Inn.

Memberships

Intellectual Property Bar Association; Chancery Bar Association.

Education

Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge (2002 MA Hons Natural Sciences, Neuroscience); ICSL (2004, BVC); City University (2003 Diploma in Law CPE).

Mentions

Content supplied by Three New Square Intellectual Property