Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 JULY 2026

Old Rules, New Tools: N.D. Cal. Applies Traditional TAR Principles To Generative AI Discovery

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

A recent Northern District of California decision provides crucial guidance on using generative AI tools in legal discovery, establishing that courts will treat AI-powered document review as a form of traditional Technology Assisted Review rather than a novel discovery category. The ruling addresses key questions about pre-filtering documents with search terms and the extent to which parties must disclose AI review metrics to opposing counsel.

United StatesTechnology

As parties continue to use generative AI tools in discovery, a recent decision from the Northern District of California, Schulte v. LinkedIn Corp. (N.D. Cal. June 30, 2026), provides welcome guidance. To assist in reviewing custodial documents for responsiveness, LinkedIn planned to use aiR, a generative AI-powered document review product offered within the Relativity platform. The plaintiffs raised several challenges. The court rejected all of them.

Three takeaways from the ruling stand out:

  • First and foremost, the decision indicates that courts will treat generative AI review as a new form of traditional Technology Assisted Review (TAR) rather than a novel category of discovery.
  • Second, parties will likely be allowed to use appropriate search terms to “pre-cull” documents before feeding them into a generative AI review tool.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from